diff options
author | Marti Bolivar <mbolivar@mit.edu> | 2010-12-21 10:27:37 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marti Bolivar <mbolivar@mit.edu> | 2010-12-21 10:27:37 -0500 |
commit | c45bccad44187da27505cf5808424e709e3f54a1 (patch) | |
tree | 18a459a50f8d0551ba046e30462c93999d982725 /docs/source/lang/cpp/switchcase.rst | |
parent | 84fd2532a7f23d20354ff590790b3f892cb7e7d7 (diff) | |
parent | d5ad2a27f4e69e6cc9324331945937c983c30366 (diff) | |
download | librambutan-c45bccad44187da27505cf5808424e709e3f54a1.tar.gz librambutan-c45bccad44187da27505cf5808424e709e3f54a1.zip |
Merge branch 'master' into debug-serialusb.
Chose debug-serialusb version in cases of conflict.
Conflicts:
libmaple/usb/usb_callbacks.c
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/source/lang/cpp/switchcase.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/source/lang/cpp/switchcase.rst | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/source/lang/cpp/switchcase.rst b/docs/source/lang/cpp/switchcase.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b484bc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/source/lang/cpp/switchcase.rst @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +.. highlight:: cpp + +.. _lang-switchcase: + +``switch``\ /\ ``case`` +======================= + +Like :ref:`if <lang-if>` statements, A ``switch`` statement controls +program flow by allowing you to specify different code that should be +executed under various cases. + +The general syntax looks like this:: + + switch (var) { + case val1: + // statements + break; + case val2: + // statements + break; + ... + default: + // statements + } + +Where ``var`` is a variable whose value to investigate, and the +``val1``, ``val2`` after each ``case`` are constant values that +``var`` might be. + +Description +----------- + +A ``switch`` statement compares the value of a variable to the values +specified in ``case`` statements. When a ``case`` statement is found +whose value matches that of the variable, the code in that case +statement is run. + +Here's a more concrete example:: + + switch (var) { + case 1: + doThing1(); + break; + case 2: + doThing2(); + break; + } + afterTheSwitch(); + +In the above example, if ``var == 1``, then the code beginning on the +line after ``case 1`` gets executed. That is, if ``var`` is one, +``doThing1()`` gets called first, and then the ``break`` statement is +executed. + +The ``break`` keyword exits the ``switch`` statement, and is typically +used at the end of each ``case``. Since there is a ``break`` at the +end of ``case 1``, the ``switch`` statement exits, and the next line +to be run is the one which calls ``afterTheSwitch()``. + +Without a ``break``, the ``switch`` statement will continue executing +the following ``case`` expressions ("falling-through") until a +``break`` (or the end of the switch statement) is reached. Let's +pretend the ``switch`` looked like this instead:: + + switch (var) { + case 1: + doThing1(); + // no break statement anymore + case 2: + doThing2(); + break; + } + afterTheSwitch(); + +Now, if ``var`` is one, ``doThing1()`` gets executed like before. +However, without a ``break``, the code would continue to be executed +line-by-line, so ``doThing2()`` would be called next. At this point, +a ``break`` has been reached, so the program continues by calling +``afterTheSwitch()``. This is usually not what you want, which is why +each ``case`` usually has a ``break`` at the end. + +.. _lang-switchcase-default: + +Writing "``default:``" instead of a ``case`` statement allows you to +specify what to do if none of the ``case`` statements matches. Having +a ``default`` is optional (you can leave it out), but if you have one, +it must appear after all of the ``case`` statements. Let's add a +``default`` to the ``switch`` we've been discussing:: + + switch (var) { + case 1: + doThing1(); + break; + case 2: + doThing2(); + break; + default: + doSomethingElse(); + } + afterTheSwitch(); + +If ``var`` is one, then ``doThing1()`` gets called. If ``var`` is +two, ``doThing2()`` gets called. If ``var`` is anything else, +``doSomethingElse()`` gets called. As stated above, a ``default`` is +optional. If you're missing one and none of the ``case`` statements +match, the ``switch`` does nothing at all, as if it weren't there. + +``switch`` statements are often used with an :ref:`enum <lang-enum>` +value as the variable to compare. In this case, you can write down +all of the values the ``enum`` takes as ``case`` statements, and be +sure you've covered all the possibilities. + +See also: +--------- + +- :ref:`if/else <lang-if>` + +.. include:: cc-attribution.txt |