diff options
| author | bnewbold <bnewbold@robocracy.org> | 2016-06-11 17:23:36 -0400 | 
|---|---|---|
| committer | bnewbold <bnewbold@robocracy.org> | 2016-06-11 17:23:36 -0400 | 
| commit | 2f79265986a185e79b14e0ddf113ecf355da830f (patch) | |
| tree | 03efd4cfc63b30f1a43463886279cb112710b59c /tmp | |
| parent | 556b3c33daa7a41550cb2bbe23d333ba39414be0 (diff) | |
| download | knowledge-2f79265986a185e79b14e0ddf113ecf355da830f.tar.gz knowledge-2f79265986a185e79b14e0ddf113ecf355da830f.zip  | |
move some decent pages over to misc folder
Diffstat (limited to 'tmp')
| -rw-r--r-- | tmp/SCUBA.page | 89 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tmp/artists.page | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tmp/newcomb-paradox.page | 69 | 
3 files changed, 0 insertions, 165 deletions
diff --git a/tmp/SCUBA.page b/tmp/SCUBA.page deleted file mode 100644 index 6e15c52..0000000 --- a/tmp/SCUBA.page +++ /dev/null @@ -1,89 +0,0 @@ ---- -format: rst -categories:  -toc: no -... - -============ -SCUBA Diving -============ ---------------------------------------------- -Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus ---------------------------------------------- - -SCUBA stands for "Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus". -One of the primary organization regulating recreational SCUBA diving is  -PADI (the Professional Association of Diving Instructors).  - -Equipment ---------- - -:BCD:   The buoyancy control device is basically an inflatable live vest  -        that you can inflate using the regulator (or by mouth) to control -        your buoyancy. Your buoyancy changes as you use up air (tank gets -        lighter for same volume displaced), inhale/exhale, swim in water -        of different temperature or salinity, or change depth: increased -        pressure compresses any flexible air pockets, including the BCD -        itself, neoprene foam, or a dry-suit. -        Most BCDs have their own pressure hoses coming from the first stage -        regulator that supply air. -        Sometimes there is only one vent valve, which has to be at the -        highest orientation or air will not vent out of the bladders. -:Tank:  Most tanks are made of steel or aluminum and can store compressed -        air of up to 3000psi. They are stored at pressure to prevent moisture -        from leaking in. There is a valve built into the tank itself that -        usually gets taken apart and repaired every two years. Tanks -        can last for decades even with heavy use; they are pressure tested -        for fatigue and leaks. -:Regulator: The first-stage regulator is connected to the tank and steps -            the pressure down to about 250psi above the surrounding/ambient -            pressure. Hoses carry air at this mid-level pressure to the second -            stage regulator/mouthpiece, which steps the pressure down to -            about what is in your lungs. Depending on the regulator they can -            be stiff (you have to suck a bit to get air, but then it rushes -            in with force) or very natural feeling (air comes very smoothly -            on inhalation and doesn't press into your lungs). -:Alternate: These days almost everybody carries a second regulator mouthpiece -            for emergencies. These are always on and ready to breath from, -            but usually stiffer so they don't free-flow as often. -:Dive Computer: -        A dive computer monitors time and depth to give you an accurate picture -        of how much excess nitrogen is in a diver's bloodstream. By  -        continuously integrating they usually "give more time at depth" than -        hand calculations using tables (which err towards safety). -:Dry Suit:  A dry suit is a sealed and air tight, keeping the diver's skin dry. -            Extra insulation is needed to give warmth underneath. Some dry -            suits are made of compressed neoprene. -            A dry suit has to be constantly adjusted with tank air just like -            the BCD to maintain inflation and buoyancy. -:Wet Suit:  Wet suits work on the principle of holding water against the skin: -            a diver's body warms this water and stays cozy as long as water -            flow is restricted enough. Even little bit too much flow through -            wrist or ankle openings can be very cold. -         - -Depths ------- -A PADI Open Water Diving course gives a recommended limit of 20m/60ft. -A "deep dive adventure course" gives a recommended limit of 30m/100ft, -and additional experience gives a limit of 40m/130ft. - -With careful decompression stops and enriched compressed air (higher oxygen -content) it's possible to reach depths of hundreds of meters. Sometimes -commercial divers will dive for many hours using surface supplied air, -then live at the surface in a compression chamber overnight between dives -to stay at the same pressure [*]_. - -History -------- -I'm pretty sure `Jacques Cousteau`_ invented the aqualung, which is the basis -for modern diving, but I'll have to check. - -.. _Jacques Cousteau: /k/jacquescousteau/ - -Flying ------- -After a regular no-decompression dive, wait at least 12  -hours before flying (or going to high altitude, eg over 300m). - -.. [*] Need a citation, heard this word of mouth diff --git a/tmp/artists.page b/tmp/artists.page deleted file mode 100644 index ac1cc86..0000000 --- a/tmp/artists.page +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -Artists -======= - -* Kay Sage (1898-1963), American Surrealist Painter -* Yves Tanguy (1900-1955), French Surrealist Painter -* Hans Bellmer (1902-1975), French. "Die Puppe" series (dolls) -* Francis Picabia (1879-1953) French Painter diff --git a/tmp/newcomb-paradox.page b/tmp/newcomb-paradox.page deleted file mode 100644 index 58ace89..0000000 --- a/tmp/newcomb-paradox.page +++ /dev/null @@ -1,69 +0,0 @@ ---- -format: rst -toc: no -... -================== -Newcomb's Dialemma -================== - -Newcomb's paradox was thought up by a researcher named Newcomb; it was first -explored and written up by Robert Nozick in the 1969 paper  -"Newcomb's Problem and Two principles of Choice".  - -The Situation -------------- -As narrated by an all knowing "predictor":: - -    I am going to give you a choice. It is important to know that I really -    pretty much know what you are going to do. I have been watching their whole -    life and am additionally an immortal being; i've been doing this a long -    time and always guess correctly. It's also important to know that I am -    unbiased and don't care which decision you make, I have nothing to gain -    either way. - -    Here are two boxes: a large and a small. The small has a 10 shekel coin -    in it (show everybody). The large one may or may not have a thousand -    shekels in it; you don't know. Your choice is to either take only the -    large box or to take both the large and small boxes. The twist is that -    I already knew which decision you will make and decided whether or not -    to put the $1000 in the large box or not based on that knowledge. -    If I knew you would "two box", then I left the large box empty. If I knew -    you would "one box" then I filled it.  - -Dominance Mindset ------------------ -Regardless of what decision was made previously, and whether or not there -is anything in the large box, the person is better off taking both boxes; -either they will get just $10 (better than none) or $1010 (better -than $1000). So two-box. - -Trusting Mindset ----------------- -The predictor is pretty much always right so we can just ignore the  -possibility that they are wrong. In this case, choosing to one-box -implies that the Predictor knew you would and you get $1000;  -choosing to two-box implies that the predictor knew you would and you -only get $10. - -The predictor doesn't even have to be perfectly accurate; say they are -90%: -If you one-box, your expected value is $900. -If you two-box, your expected value is $110. - -Discussion ----------- -It's disputed whether this is a paradox, and there are many deeper arguments -that I don't have time to go into here. Ultimately, I am a one-boxer  -though this is something of a minority position. - -Afterword ---------- -The person who taught me this paradox, Professor Augustin Rayo, a -two-boxer, then had this to add. He was talking with his one-boxing friend -and accused her of letting irrationality undermine her logic: she is so -optimistic that if a statement S is unprovable, but it would be nicer if S -was true than false, then she pretens that S is proven. So basically, even -though there is no rationalization, she will accept a statement "just -because it would be nice", and this isn't how logic works. To which she -replied "but wouldn't it be nice if it was?". -  | 
