binutils: move patches to new model

On commit 5538e4766201aa0c1c23721cfc99cbbde595964b the versioned package
patches changed the directory structure but the packages weren't fixed.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>

5 files changed, 190 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ea3d1b606
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+r10231 | lethal | 2005-05-02 09:58:00 -0400 (Mon, 02 May 2005) | 13 lines
+
+Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either, so we 
+fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for 
+sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more 
+inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise).
+
+--- a/configure
++++ b/configure
+@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@
+   mips*-*-*)
+     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
+     ;;
+-  sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
++  sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
+     case "${target}" in
+       sh*-*-elf)
+          ;;
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@
+   mips*-*-*)
+     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
+     ;;
+-  sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
++  sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
+     case "${target}" in
+       sh*-*-elf)
+          ;;
diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5cb0f614d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+diff -u binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.am binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.am
+--- binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.am	2007-06-18 19:29:29.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.am	2007-06-25 10:00:36.000000000 +0200
+@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
+ # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
+ # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
+ # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
+-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
++scriptdir = $(libdir)
+ 
+ EMUL = @EMUL@
+ EMULATION_OFILES = @EMULATION_OFILES@
+diff -u binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.in binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.in
+--- binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.in	2007-06-18 19:29:29.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.in	2007-06-25 10:00:36.000000000 +0200
+@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
+ # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
+ # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
+ # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
+-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
++scriptdir = $(libdir)
+ BASEDIR = $(srcdir)/..
+ BFDDIR = $(BASEDIR)/bfd
+ INCDIR = $(BASEDIR)/include
diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..df783109b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+diff -Nura binutils-2.21.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.21/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
+--- binutils-2.21.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2010-10-29 09:10:36.000000000 -0300
++++ binutils-2.21/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2010-12-10 09:26:56.746102724 -0300
+@@ -1270,6 +1270,8 @@
+ 	      && command_line.rpath == NULL)
+ 	    {
+ 	      lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
++	      if ((lib_path) && (strlen (lib_path) == 0))
++	      	lib_path = NULL;
+ 	      if (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_search_needed (lib_path, &n,
+ 						      force))
+ 		break;
+@@ -1497,6 +1499,8 @@
+   rpath = command_line.rpath;
+   if (rpath == NULL)
+     rpath = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
++  if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0))
++  	rpath = NULL;
+ 
+   for (abfd = link_info.input_bfds; abfd; abfd = abfd->link_next)
+     if (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour)
diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d21e4cb10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Signed-off-by: Sven Rebhan <odinshorse@googlemail.com>
+
+Always try to prepend the sysroot prefix to absolute filenames first.
+
+http://bugs.gentoo.org/275666
+http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10340
+
+--- a/ld/ldfile.c
++++ b/ld/ldfile.c
+@@ -308,18 +308,24 @@
+      directory first.  */
+   if (! entry->is_archive)
+     {
+-      if (entry->sysrooted && IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (entry->filename))
++      /* For absolute pathnames, try to always open the file in the
++	 sysroot first. If this fails, try to open the file at the
++	 given location. */
++      entry->sysrooted = is_sysrooted_pathname(entry->filename, FALSE);
++      if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (entry->filename) && ld_sysroot && ! entry->sysrooted)
+ 	{
+ 	  char *name = concat (ld_sysroot, entry->filename,
+ 			       (const char *) NULL);
+ 	  if (ldfile_try_open_bfd (name, entry))
+ 	    {
+ 	      entry->filename = name;
++	      entry->sysrooted = TRUE;
+ 	      return TRUE;
+ 	    }
+ 	  free (name);
+ 	}
+-      else if (ldfile_try_open_bfd (entry->filename, entry))
++
++      if (ldfile_try_open_bfd (entry->filename, entry))
+ 	{
+ 	  entry->sysrooted = IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (entry->filename)
+ 	    && is_sysrooted_pathname (entry->filename, TRUE);
diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c1efacf24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
+http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
+
+2011-12-03  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
+
+	PR ld/13470
+	* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
+	change in 2011-07-01 commit.  Comment.
+	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
+
+===================================================================
+RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v
+retrieving revision 1.302.2.1
+retrieving revision 1.302.2.2
+diff -u -r1.302.2.1 -r1.302.2.2
+--- src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011/11/15 11:36:52	1.302.2.1
++++ src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011/12/03 00:58:01	1.302.2.2
+@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@
+   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
+   edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
+ 
+-  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
+-  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+-    return;
+-
+   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
+     {
+       if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
+@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@
+       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
+     }
+ 
++  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
++     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
++     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
++     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
++     code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
++     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
++     DIR sym here.  */
++  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
++    return;
++
+   /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
+      the symbol which just became indirect.  */
+   edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
+===================================================================
+RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c,v
+retrieving revision 1.363.2.4
+retrieving revision 1.363.2.5
+diff -u -r1.363.2.4 -r1.363.2.5
+--- src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011/11/08 13:46:36	1.363.2.4
++++ src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011/12/03 00:58:02	1.363.2.5
+@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@
+   edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
+   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
+ 
+-  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
+-  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+-    return;
+-
+   /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym.  */
+   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
+     {
+@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@
+       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
+     }
+ 
++  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
++     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
++     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
++     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
++     code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
++     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
++     DIR sym here.  */
++  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
++    return;
++
+   /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
+      symbol which just became indirect.  */
+   if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)