From 059070e383e5790c1434ea1073704f0b42653d8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Czygan Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:31:31 +0200 Subject: seaweedfs proposal: fix typos and wording --- proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'proposals') diff --git a/proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md b/proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md index 9473cb7..5f4ff0b 100644 --- a/proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md +++ b/proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Problem: minio inserts slowed down after inserting 80M or more objects. Summary: I did four test runs, three failed, one (testrun-4) succeeded. -* [testrun-4](https://git.archive.org/webgroup/sandcrawler/-/blob/martin-seaweed-s3/proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md#testrun-4) +* [testrun-4](https://git.archive.org/webgroup/sandcrawler/-/blob/master/proposals/2020_seaweed_s3.md#testrun-4) So far, in a non-distributed mode, the project looks usable. Added 200M objects (about 550G) in 6 days. Full CPU load, 400M RAM usage, constant insert times. @@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ on wbgrp-svc170.us.archive.org (4 core E5-2620 v4, 4GB RAM). ## Setup There are frequent [releases](https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/releases) -but for the test, we used a build off the master branch. +but for the test, we used a build off master branch. -Directions from configuring AWS CLI for seaweedfs: +Directions for configuring AWS CLI for seaweedfs: [https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/wiki/AWS-CLI-with-SeaweedFS](https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/wiki/AWS-CLI-with-SeaweedFS). ### Build the binary @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ a7f8f0b49e6183da06fc2d1411c7a0714a2cc96b A single, 55M binary emerges after a few seconds. The binary contains subcommands to run different parts of seaweed, e.g. master or volume servers, -filer and commands for maintenance tasks, like backup and compact. +filer and commands for maintenance tasks, like backup and compaction. To *deploy*, just copy this binary to the destination. @@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ total size:820752408 file_count:261934 ### Custom S3 benchmark -To simulate the use case of S3 use case for 100-500M small files (grobid xml, -pdftotext, ...), I created a synthetic benchmark. +To simulate the use case of S3 for 100-500M small files (grobid xml, pdftotext, +...), I created a synthetic benchmark. * [https://gist.github.com/miku/6f3fee974ba82083325c2f24c912b47b](https://gist.github.com/miku/6f3fee974ba82083325c2f24c912b47b) @@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ We just try to fill up the datastore with millions of 5k blobs. ### testrun-1 -Small set, just to run. Status: done. Learned that the default in memory volume -index grows too quickly for the 4GB machine. +Small set, just to run. Status: done. Learned that the default in-memory volume +index grows too quickly for the 4GB RAM machine. ``` $ weed server -dir /tmp/martin-seaweedfs-testrun-1 -s3 -volume.max 512 -master.volumeSizeLimitMB 100 @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ Sustained 400 S3 puts/s, RAM usage 41% of a 4G machine. 56G on disk. * use leveldb, leveldbLarge * try "auto" volumes -* Status: done. Observed: rapid memory usage. +* Status: done. Observed: rapid memory usage increase. ``` $ weed server -dir /tmp/martin-seaweedfs-testrun-3 -s3 -volume.max 0 -volume.index=leveldbLarge -filer=false -master.volumeSizeLimitMB 100 @@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ sys 0m0.293s #### Single process random reads +* via [s3read.go](https://gist.github.com/miku/6f3fee974ba82083325c2f24c912b47b#file-s3read-go) + Running 1000 random reads takes 49s. #### Concurrent random reads -- cgit v1.2.3