diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/imx21/patches')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/imx21/patches/010-mach-vp6500.patch | 22 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/imx21/patches/011-mach-type.patch | 11 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/imx21/patches/040-pwm.patch | 137 |
3 files changed, 170 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/imx21/patches/010-mach-vp6500.patch b/target/linux/imx21/patches/010-mach-vp6500.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..37bfa676f --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/imx21/patches/010-mach-vp6500.patch @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig ++++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig +@@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ if MACH_MX27 + + comment "MX27 platforms:" + ++config MACH_VP6500 ++ bool "Phillips VP6500 VoIP phone" ++ depends on MACH_MX21 ++ help ++ Include support for the Phillips VP6500 VoIP phone. ++ + config MACH_MX27ADS + bool "MX27ADS platform" + select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_I2C +--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile ++++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile +@@ -32,3 +32,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_CPUIMX27) += mach-cpui + obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_EUKREA_MBIMX27_BASEBOARD) += eukrea_mbimx27-baseboard.o + obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_PCA100) += mach-pca100.o + obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MXT_TD60) += mach-mxt_td60.o ++obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_VP6500) += mach-vp6500.o diff --git a/target/linux/imx21/patches/011-mach-type.patch b/target/linux/imx21/patches/011-mach-type.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..873f03083 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/imx21/patches/011-mach-type.patch @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +--- a/arch/arm/tools/mach-types ++++ b/arch/arm/tools/mach-types +@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ sg560 MACH_SG560 SG560 513 + dp1000 MACH_DP1000 DP1000 514 + omap_osk MACH_OMAP_OSK OMAP_OSK 515 + rg100v3 MACH_RG100V3 RG100V3 516 +-mx2ads MACH_MX2ADS MX2ADS 517 ++vp6500 MACH_VP6500 VP6500 517 + pxa_kilo MACH_PXA_KILO PXA_KILO 518 + ixp4xx_eagle MACH_IXP4XX_EAGLE IXP4XX_EAGLE 519 + tosa MACH_TOSA TOSA 520 diff --git a/target/linux/imx21/patches/040-pwm.patch b/target/linux/imx21/patches/040-pwm.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..af47ad1de --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/imx21/patches/040-pwm.patch @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +--- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c ++++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c +@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ + #define MX1_PWMS 0x04 /* PWM Sample Register */ + #define MX1_PWMP 0x08 /* PWM Period Register */ + ++#define MX1_PWMC_EN (1 << 4) ++#define MX1_PWMC_PRESCALER_MASK (0x7f << 8) ++#define MX1_PWMC_PRESCALER(x) ((x & 0x7f) << 8) ++#define MX1_PWMC_CLKSEL_MASK 0x3 ++#define MX1_PWMC_CLKSEL(x) ((x & 0x3)) + + /* i.MX27, i.MX31, i.MX35 share the same PWM function block: */ + +@@ -54,26 +59,33 @@ struct pwm_device { + + int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) + { ++ unsigned long long c; ++ unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale; ++ + if (pwm == NULL || period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns) + return -EINVAL; + ++ c = clk_get_rate(pwm->clk); ++ ++ c = c * period_ns; ++ ++ if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) ++ c >>= 1; ++ ++ do_div(c, 1000000000); ++ period_cycles = c; ++ ++ prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1; ++ ++ period_cycles /= prescale; ++ c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * duty_ns; ++ do_div(c, period_ns); ++ duty_cycles = c; ++ ++ + if (cpu_is_mx27() || cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25()) { +- unsigned long long c; +- unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale; + u32 cr; + +- c = clk_get_rate(pwm->clk); +- c = c * period_ns; +- do_div(c, 1000000000); +- period_cycles = c; +- +- prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1; +- +- period_cycles /= prescale; +- c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * duty_ns; +- do_div(c, period_ns); +- duty_cycles = c; +- + writel(duty_cycles, pwm->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR); + writel(period_cycles, pwm->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR); + +@@ -86,25 +98,28 @@ int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, i + + writel(cr, pwm->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); + } else if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx21()) { +- /* The PWM subsystem allows for exact frequencies. However, +- * I cannot connect a scope on my device to the PWM line and +- * thus cannot provide the program the PWM controller +- * exactly. Instead, I'm relying on the fact that the +- * Bootloader (u-boot or WinCE+haret) has programmed the PWM +- * function group already. So I'll just modify the PWM sample +- * register to follow the ratio of duty_ns vs. period_ns +- * accordingly. +- * +- * This is good enough for programming the brightness of +- * the LCD backlight. +- * +- * The real implementation would divide PERCLK[0] first by +- * both the prescaler (/1 .. /128) and then by CLKSEL +- * (/2 .. /16). +- */ +- u32 max = readl(pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMP); +- u32 p = max * duty_ns / period_ns; +- writel(max - p, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMS); ++ unsigned long clksel = 0; ++ u32 ctrl; ++ ++ while (prescale >= 0x80 && clksel < 4) { ++ prescale >>= 1; ++ ++clksel; ++ } ++ ++ if (clksel > 3) ++ return -EINVAL; ++ ++ ctrl = readl(pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ writel(ctrl & ~MX1_PWMC_EN, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ ++ writel(duty_cycles, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMS); ++ writel(period_cycles, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMP); ++ ++ ctrl &= ~(MX1_PWMC_PRESCALER_MASK | MX1_PWMC_CLKSEL_MASK); ++ ctrl |= MX1_PWMC_PRESCALER(prescale); ++ ctrl |= MX1_PWMC_CLKSEL(clksel); ++ writel(ctrl, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ + } else { + BUG(); + } +@@ -116,6 +131,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pwm_config); + int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm) + { + int rc = 0; ++ if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) { ++ u32 ctrl; ++ ctrl = readl(pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ writel(ctrl | MX1_PWMC_EN, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ } + + if (!pwm->clk_enabled) { + rc = clk_enable(pwm->clk); +@@ -128,7 +148,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pwm_enable); + + void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm) + { +- writel(0, pwm->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); ++ if (cpu_is_mx27() || cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25()) { ++ writel(0, pwm->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); ++ } else if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx2()) { ++ u32 ctrl; ++ ctrl = readl(pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ writel(ctrl & ~MX1_PWMC_EN, pwm->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); ++ } + + if (pwm->clk_enabled) { + clk_disable(pwm->clk); |