1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
|
libmaple Coding Standards
=========================
Author: Marti Bolivar (mbolivar@leaflabs.com)
LeafLabs team members are required to follow these when producing new
code. Community contributors to libmaple are strongly encouraged to
do so; following these rules will greatly increase the probability
that your patches will be folded in.
In general, do it like this unless there's a really good reason why
not. You being lazy doesn't count as a good reason. Most, if not
all, of these decisions are entirely arbitrary, but it's important for
readability that we be consistent.
The file ``.dir-locals.el`` in the libmaple root directory already
ensures that many of these standards are followed by default in Emacs
(but not on Windows, where it would need to be named
``_dir_locals.el``, and no way, man). There's also some elisp
scattered about this file which will provide you additional help.
Vim customizations to do the same thing would be nice (hint, hint)!
.. contents:: Contents
:local:
License
-------
- Put an MIT license at the beginning of the file (look at any of our
source files for an example). Copyright should go either to you or
to LeafLabs, LLC.
.. highlight:: scheme
Emacs: if you don't like seeing the license, you should use
elide-head (which will hide it for you). You can use the following::
(require 'elide-head)
(setq programming-mode-hooks '(c-mode-hook c++-mode-hook))
(add-to-list 'elide-head-headers-to-hide
'("The MIT License" . "DEALINGS IN\n [*] THE SOFTWARE"))
(add-to-list 'elide-head-headers-to-hide
'("The MIT License" . "DEALINGS IN THE\n...SOFTWARE"))
(dolist (hook programming-mode-hooks)
(add-hook hook (lambda () (elide-head))))
Whitespace/Indentation
----------------------
- 4 space indents. [Set in ``.dir-locals.el``]
- Unix newlines. [Some exceptions are currently grandfathered in;
these will go away in time.]
- No tab characters. [Set in ``.dir-locals.el``]
- No trailing whitespace. For help getting this (and no tab
characters) done automatically in Emacs, you can use this:
http://github.com/mbolivar/code-fascism
I hear tell you can get something similar in Vim; ask around, I
guess.
- Files end in exactly one newline. [The presence of a newline at EOF
is already done by ``c-require-final-newline`` in recent versions of
Emacs.]
- Exactly two newlines separate source paragraphs (you do separate
your code into paragraphs, don't you?).
- The first line in a function is non-blank.
.. highlight:: cpp
- Exactly one space after ``if``, ``else``, ``for``, and ``while``,
before the following ``{`` or ``(``. One space before ``else``,
after the preceding ``}``. For example::
// This is good; we like this:
if (foo) {
while (quux) {
bar();
}
} else {
baz();
}
// THIS IS BAD! DON'T DO THIS:
if(foo){
while(quux){
bar();
}
}else{
baz();
}
- Exactly one space in between binary arithmetic, logical, and
comparison operators and their operands. This doesn't apply to the
. and -> operators. Examples::
// This is good:
int x = a + b * (c - d);
if (x != 0 && a > 7) {
SerialUSB.println(x);
}
// THIS IS BAD!
int x = a+b*(c-d);
if (x!=0 && a>7) {
SerialUSB.println(x);
}
// This is good:
uint32 adc_data = ADC1_BASE->DR;
SerialUSB.println(adc_data);
// THIS IS BAD!
uint32 adc_data = ADC1_BASE -> DR;
SerialUSB . println(adc_data);
- No space between a unary operator and its operand. Examples::
// Good:
x++;
// BAD!
x ++;
// Good:
y = -x;
// BAD!
y = - x;
- If you need to break up a long line:
* Prefer to break up long expressions after a binary operator. Example::
// Good:
if (some_really_long_conditional_wow_this_really_goes_on_forever ||
maybe_something_else_could_happen_too) {
...
}
// BAD!
if (some_really_long_conditional_wow_this_really_goes_on_forever
|| maybe_something_else_could_happen_too) {
...
}
* When breaking up a function's arguments over multiple lines, align
the arguments on subsequent lines with the first argument.
Example::
// Good:
return_type value_i_got = function_with_a_really_long_name(argument1,
argument2,
argument3);
// BAD!
return_type value_i_got = function_with_a_really_long_name(argument1,
argument2,
argument3);
// BAD!
return_type value_i_got = function_with_a_really_long_name(argument1,
argument2,
argument3);
- In function invocations, no space in between the function name and
the opening parenthesis. Example::
// Good:
SerialUSB.println("Hello, world!");
// BAD!
SerialUSB.println ("Hello, world!");
- Don't indent C code within a conditionally-compiled ``extern "C"``
block. Example::
// Good:
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C"{
#endif
void some_c_function(void);
#ifdef __cplusplus
} // extern "C"
#endif
// BAD!
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C"{
#endif
void some_c_function(void);
#ifdef __cplusplus
} // extern "C"
#endif
.. highlight:: scheme
Emacs does the "bad" behavior by default, which can be very
annoying. You can turn this off with::
(defun c-mode-inextern-lang-hook ()
(setcdr (assq 'inextern-lang c-offsets-alist) '-))
(add-hook 'c-mode-hook c-mode-inextern-lang-hook)
Comments
--------
.. highlight:: c++
- Multi-line comments are pretty flexible. Any of these is fine::
/* Comment starts here.
* Continued lines have a '*' before them.
* The comment can end after the last line.
*/
/* Comment starts here.
* The comment can end on the same line. */
/*
* You can also place a newline after the opening "/*".
*/
- Doxygen comments are multi-line comments that begin with ``/**``
instead.
- Single-line comments on the same line are ``//`` in C++. (That's OK
in C as well).
- Single-line comments on their own source line should be ``/* */`` in
C, but can also be ``//`` in C++. (This isn't of great importance).
In Emacs, you can use M-; (comment-dwim), and it'll Do What You
Mean.
Braces
------
- Mostly 1TBS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#Variant:_1TBS
The only difference is that the opening brace of a function's
definition occurs exactly one space character after the closing
parenthesis in that function's parameter list. Example::
void func(void) {
...
}
Naming conventions
------------------
There's always a fight about upper and lower case vs. underscores.
We'll handle this as follows.
- First, ``Dont_Mix_Like_This``, because ``It_Looks_Really_Ugly``, ok?
[There's been some debate about this, and some exceptions are
already grandfathered in, so in order to settle it, let's call this
a "recommendation" instead of "requirement".]
- Variables: Use underscores to separate words in C identifiers::
int some_example_name;
User-facing C++ variables should be camel cased
(``thisIsAnExample``, ``boardPWMPins``, etc.), for consistency with
the Arduino style. It's probably a good idea for you to case
non-user facing C++ variables in the C style; this will help
disambiguate what's part of the Wirish API and what's not.
- Classes: Pascal case. So ``ThisIsAClassName``, but ``thisIsNot``,
``this_is_not``, and like I said,
``Dont_You_DareTryANYTHING_STUPID``.
- Functions: C functions are all lowercase, and words are separated by
underscores. C++ method names are camel cased.
- Structs: Usually like variables (``adc_dev``, ``adc_reg_map``,
etc.), but it's not crucial. Don't feel obliged to put ``_t`` at
the end of the type name; we don't.
- Macros and constants: all caps, separated by underscores. C++
variables with the ``const`` qualifier generally aren't considered
"constants" for the purposes of this rule; i.e., they are cased
according to the rules for variables. We make an exception for
``PIN_MAP``, because it's the central Wirish data structure.
- foo.h gets ``#ifdef``\ 'ed to ``_FOO_H_``.
- Acronyms: The case of letters in an acronym is determined by the
case of the first letter in the acronym, which is determined by
following the above rules. Examples::
// Good:
void usb_func() { ... }
void frob_usb_disc() { ... }
class SomethingUSB {
void usbInit();
void initUSB();
};
// BAD:
class BadUsb { ... }; // say "GoodUSB" instead
void swizzle_USB_disc() { ... } // say "swizzle_usb_disc" instead
Documentation
-------------
- You **must** document your code. At a bare minimum, this means
Doxygen comments on every user-facing function and type.
Additionally, you need to individually document the fields and
enumerator values of ``struct``\ s and ``enum``\ s. See any
register map type's definition for an example.
- For libmaple proper, you don't need comments for each register bit
definition (for now).
- Doxygen comments generally just belong on types, functions,
etc. that are part of the public user-facing API. This generally
means that if there's ReST documentation for it under docs/source/,
it needs Doxygen comments, and that ReST should use Breathe to pull
that Doxygen comment out. (For more info on this, see docs/README).
There are some exceptions to this rule since Breathe isn't totally
mature yet and Sphinx's C++ domain is still in flux. In these
cases, document the code "manually" in ReST.
This should be avoided if at all possible, since it creates a
maintenance burden of documenting things in two places at once, and
makes it easier for documentation to go stale.
If you do have to document something manually, put a comment in the
source file informing future maintainers about it, so they'll pay
extra attention when making changes.
- When adding peripheral support, it would be nice if you put
longer-form comments into the /notes/ directory, with a comment in
the corresponding .h file referring to it. See /libmaple/dac.h for
an example.
This lets us keep the source files relatively free of "introductory"
material, while allowing new readers a convenient starting point.
These longer-form notes also have a habit of turning into
user-facing documentation.
- For libmaple proper (the pure C library under libmaple/); the
convention is to document any user-facing function at the point where
it is defined. In particular, this means you should document an
externally-linked function defined in a .c file in that .c file, not
in the header file where it is declared to the user.
General Formatting
------------------
- Keep it 80-column clean. That means Emacs says the largest column
number=79. You should turn on column number mode to help you out:
.. highlight:: scheme
(column-number-mode 1)
You can get more help from lineker-mode:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~sjpaavol/programs/lineker.el
Just put lineker.el somewhere in your load-path, and:
(require 'lineker)
(dolist (hook '(c-mode-hook c++-mode-hook))
(add-hook hook (lambda () (lineker-mode 1))))
Language Features and Compiler Extensions
-----------------------------------------
- In libmaple proper, aim for C99 compatibility. Some GCC extensions
are OK, but let's not go crazy.
- If you'd like to get code into libmaple which uses a GCC extension
not already in use elsewhere, ask a LeafLabs developer (or another
one, if you are one) what they think about it first.
- Explicitly approved GCC extensions:
* asm volatile:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
* Nested functions:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html
- In wirish, generally be very conservative when using C++ features
that aren't part of C. We are forced to use C++ for Arduino
compatibility (and the general Arduino style of pretending that an
object is a library), but it's an angry beast, and we don't want to
provoke it. The mantra is "C with classes".
- Explicitly approved C++ features:
* Initializers that aren't constant; e.g. the ``gpio_dev*`` values
in a ``PIN_MAP``.
* Default arguments: e.g., the timeout argument defaulting to 0
(meaning to wait forever) in ``waitForButtonPress()``.
- Explicitly forbidden C++ features:
* Templates
- C++ features that are conditionally allowed, but require explicit
approval from at least two libmaple developers (one of which may be
yourself):
* Operator overloading: Never allowed when it's just for style.
Potentially allowed when you're implementing a class that models a
mathematical structure, and you'd like to implement
e.g. ``operator+()``.
|