1 files changed, 130 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/source/lang/cpp/goto.rst b/docs/source/lang/cpp/goto.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ff2f248
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/source/lang/cpp/goto.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+.. highlight:: cpp
+
+.. _lang-goto:
+
+Labels and ``goto``
+===================
+
+A *label* gives a name to a line of code within a function.  You can
+label a line by writing a name for it, then a colon (``:``), before
+the line starts.  The ``goto`` keyword allows program flow to transfer
+to a labeled line from anywhere within the same function.
+
+.. warning:: The use of ``goto`` is discouraged in C and C++
+   programming.  It is *never necessary* to use ``goto`` to write a
+   program.
+
+   Unless you know what you're doing, using ``goto`` tends to
+   encourage code which is harder to debug and understand than
+   programs without ``goto`` that do the same thing.  That said,
+   however, it's sometimes useful; :ref:`see below <goto-when-to-use>`
+   for a concrete example.
+
+Using Labels and goto
+---------------------
+
+Labels and ``goto`` are probably best explained through example.
+Let's start with an example of how to label lines.  The first line
+(``int x = analogRead(some_pin);``) in the :ref:`loop <lang-loop>`
+function below has label ``readpin``.  The third line (``delay(x);``)
+has label ``startdelay``.  The second line (``SerialUSB.println(x);``)
+does not have a label::
+
+       void loop() {
+       readpin:
+              int x = analogRead(some_pin);
+              SerialUSB.println(x); // for debugging
+       startdelay:
+              delay(x);
+              // ... more code ...
+       }
+
+Anything which can be a :ref:`variable <lang-variables>` name can
+be a label.
+
+Let's say that we wanted to print ``x`` only if it was very large, say
+at least 2000.  We might want to do this just so anybody watching on a
+:ref:`serial monitor <ide-serial-monitor>` would know they were in for
+a longer wait than usual.  We can accomplish this through the use of a
+``goto`` statement that skips the printing if ``x`` is less than
+2000::
+
+       void loop() {
+       readpin:
+              int x = analogRead(some_pin);
+              if (x < 2000) {
+                  goto startdelay;
+              }
+              SerialUSB.println(x); // for debugging
+       startdelay:
+              delay(x);
+              // ... more code ...
+       }
+
+In this modified program, whenever ``x`` is less than 2000, the body
+of the :ref:`if <lang-if>` statement in the second line is
+executed.  The ``goto`` statement inside the ``if`` body skips
+straight to the line labeled ``startdelay``, passing over the line
+doing the printing.
+
+A ``goto`` does not have to "move forwards"; it can go "backwards",
+too.  For example, the following program prints "5" forever (why?)::
+
+    void loop() {
+    printfive:
+        SerialUSB.println(5);
+        goto printfive;
+        SerialUSB.println(6);
+    }
+
+.. _goto-when-to-use:
+
+When to Use goto
+----------------
+
+As mentioned above, use of ``goto`` is `generally discouraged
+<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goto#Criticism_and_decline>`_.  However,
+when used with care, ``goto`` can simplify certain programs.  One
+important use case for ``goto`` is breaking out of deeply nested
+:ref:`for <lang-for>` loops or :ref:`if <lang-if>` logic blocks.
+Here's an example::
+
+    for(int r = 0; r < 255; r++) {
+        for(int g = 255; g > -1; g--) {
+            for(int b = 0; b < 255; b++) {
+                if (analogRead(0) > 250) {
+                    goto bailout;
+                }
+                // more statements ...
+            }
+            // innermost loop ends here
+        }
+    }
+    bailout:
+    // more code here
+
+In the above example, whenever the :ref:`analog reading
+<lang-analogread>` on pin 0 was greater than 250, the program would
+jump to the line labeled ``bailout``, exiting all three loops at once.
+
+While there is already a :ref:`break <lang-break>` keyword for
+breaking out of a loop, it will only break out of the *innermost*
+loop.  So, if instead of saying "``goto bailout;``", there was a
+"``break;``" instead, the program would only exit from the loop with
+header "``for(int b = 0; b < 255; b++)``".  The program would continue
+at the line which reads "``// innermost loop ends here``", which is
+clearly undesirable if you wanted to leave all three loops at once.
+
+More examples of when ``goto`` is a good choice are given in Donald
+Knuth's paper, "Structured Programming with go to Statements"; see
+below for a link.
+
+See Also
+--------
+
+- Dijkstra, Edsger W. `Go To Statement Considered Harmful <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.4846&rep=rep1&type=pdf>`_ (PDF)
+
+- Knuth, Donald. `Structured Programming with go to Statements <http://pplab.snu.ac.kr/courses/adv_pl05/papers/p261-knuth.pdf>`_ (PDF)
+
+
+.. include:: cc-attribution.txt