From b1b4ecc1d7bc3aaffc6d8f88ad99709867c0dc14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bryan Newbold Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:01:21 -0700 Subject: don't require auth for editgroup annotations Amazing that this bug found it's way through... because most testing is from Python, and was having serious auth config leakage with python_client. We're still in 0.x, and this is such a small/eggregious bug that i'm not going to tag as a backwards-incompatible schema update (but will note in CHANGELOG). --- python_client/fatcat_client/api/default_api.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'python_client/fatcat_client') diff --git a/python_client/fatcat_client/api/default_api.py b/python_client/fatcat_client/api/default_api.py index 2acc0aac..7083ca1b 100644 --- a/python_client/fatcat_client/api/default_api.py +++ b/python_client/fatcat_client/api/default_api.py @@ -5063,7 +5063,7 @@ class DefaultApi(object): ['application/json']) # noqa: E501 # Authentication setting - auth_settings = ['Bearer'] # noqa: E501 + auth_settings = [] # noqa: E501 return self.api_client.call_api( '/editgroup/{editgroup_id}/annotations', 'GET', -- cgit v1.2.3