| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use string comparison.
* https://fatcat.wiki/release/spjysmrnsrgyzgq6ise5o44rlu/contribs
* https://api.datacite.org/dois/10.25940/roper-31098406
|
| |
|
|
| |
via "missed potential license", refs #58
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Up to now, we expected the description to be a string or list. Add
handling for int as well.
First appeared: Apr 22 19:58:39.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was possible that contribs got added which had no raw name. One
example would be a name consisting of whitespace only.
This fix adds a final check for this case.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Records from https://www.micropublication.org/ did not have a date in
FC, although raw data contained date strings - they were not using the
finer-grained "attributes.date" but "attributes.published" and/or
"attributes.publicationYear".
Support for those fields has been added, including a test case.
During this test (#30) a processing gap for names became clear (author
may have "given_name" and "surname", but no "name"). This bug has been
fixed, too.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use values from:
* attributes.creators[]
* attributes.contributors[]
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
As [...] we will soon add support for release_month field in the release schema.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
> The convention for display_name and raw_name is to be how the name
would normally be printed, not in index form (surname comma given_name).
So we might need to un-encode names like "Tricart, Pierre".
Use an additional `index_form_to_display_name` function to convert index
from to display form, heuristically.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `test_datacite_conversions` function will compare an input
(datacite) document to an expected output (release entity as JSON). This
way, it should not be too hard to add more cases by adding: input,
output - and by increasing the counter in the range loop within the
test.
To view input and result side by side with vim, change into the test
directory and run:
tests/files/datacite $ ./caseview.sh 18
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* add missing langdetect
* use entity_to_dict for json debug output
* factor out code for fields in function and add table driven tests
* update citeproc types
* add author as default role
* add raw_affiliation
* include relations from datacite
* remove url (covered by doi already)
Using yapf for python formatting.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current version succeeded to import a random sample of 100000 records
(0.5%) from datacite.
The --debug (write JSON to stdout) and --insert-log-file (log batch
before committing to db) flags are temporary added to help debugging.
Add few unit tests.
Some edge cases:
a) Existing keys without value requires a slightly awkward:
```
titles = attributes.get('titles', []) or []
```
b) There can be 0, 1, or more (first one wins) titles.
c) Date handling is probably not ideal. Datacite has a potentiall fine
grained list of dates.
The test case (tests/files/datacite_sample.jsonl) refers to
https://ssl.fao.org/glis/doi/10.18730/8DYM9, which has date (main
descriptor) 1986. The datacite record contains: 2017 (publicationYear,
probably the year of record creation with reference system), 1978-06-03
(collected, e.g. experimental sample), 1986 ("Accepted"). The online
version of the resource knows even one more date (2019-06-05 10:14:43 by
WIEWS update).
|
|
|
* contributors, title, date, publisher, container, license
Field and value analysis via https://github.com/miku/indigo.
|
