| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* attributes.metadataVersion
* attributes.schemaVersion
* attributes.version (source dependent values, follows suggestions in
https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.3/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v4.3.pdf#page=26,
but values vary)
Furthermore:
* attributes.types.resourceTypeGeneral
* attributes.types.resourceType
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
> include release_month as a top-level extra field [...] to
auto-populate the schema field from that
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
> always include extra values for the respective DOI registrars
(datacite, crossref, jalc), even if they are empty ({}), to be used as a
flag so we know which DOI registrar supplied the metadata.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
> The convention for display_name and raw_name is to be how the name
would normally be printed, not in index form (surname comma given_name).
So we might need to un-encode names like "Tricart, Pierre".
Use an additional `index_form_to_display_name` function to convert index
from to display form, heuristically.
|
|
|
The `test_datacite_conversions` function will compare an input
(datacite) document to an expected output (release entity as JSON). This
way, it should not be too hard to add more cases by adding: input,
output - and by increasing the counter in the range loop within the
test.
To view input and result side by side with vim, change into the test
directory and run:
tests/files/datacite $ ./caseview.sh 18
|
