work in progress on guide (mdbook)

1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/guide/src/policies.md b/guide/src/policies.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..18d84a36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/guide/src/policies.md
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# Norms and Policies
+
+These social norms are explicitly expected to evolve and mature if the number
+of contributors to the project grows. It is important to have some policies as
+a starting point, but also important not to set these policies in stone until
+they have been reviewed.
+
+## Social Norms and Conduct
+
+Contributors (editors and software developers) are expected to treat each other
+excellently, to assume good intentions, and to participate constructively.
+
+## Metadata Licensing
+
+The Fatcat catalog content license is the Creative Commons Zero ("CC-0")
+license, which is effectively a public domain grant. This applies to the
+catalog metadata itself (titles, entity relationships, citation metadata, URLs,
+hashes, identifiers), as well as "meta-meta-data" provided by editors (edit
+descriptions, progeny metadata, etc).
+
+The core catalog is designed to contain only factual information: "this work,
+known by this title and with these third-party identifiers, is believed to be
+represented by these files and published under such-and-such venue". As a norm,
+sourcing metadata (for attribution and progeny) is retained for each edit made
+to the catalog.
+
+A notable exception to this policy are abstracts, for which no copyright claims
+or license is made. Abstract content is kept separate from core catalog
+metadata; downstream users need to make their own decision regarding reuse and
+distribution of this material.
+
+As a social norm, it is expected (and appreciated!) that downstream users of
+the public API and/or bulk exports provide attribution, and even transitive
+attribution (acknowledging the original source of metadata contributed to
+Fatcat). As an academic norm, researchers are encouraged to cite the corpus as
+a dataset (when this option becomes available). However, neither of these norms
+are enforced via the copyright mechanism.
+
+As a strong norm, editors should expect full access to the full corpus and edit
+history, including all of their contributions.
+
+## Immutable History
+
+All editors agree to the licensing terms, and understand that their full public
+history of contributions is made irrevokably public. Edits and contributions
+may be *reverted*, but the history (and content) of their edits are retained.
+Edit history is not removed from the corpus on the request of an editor or when
+an editor closes their account.
+
+In an emergency situation, such as non-bibliographic content getting encoded in
+the corpus by bypassing normal filters (eg, base64 encoding hate crime content
+or exploitive photos, as has happened to some blockchain projects), the
+ecosystem may decide to collectively, in a coordinated manner, expunge specific
+records from their history.
+
+## Documentation Licensing
+
+This guide ("Fatcat: The Guide") is licensed under the Creative Commons
+Attribution license.
+
+## Software Licensing
+
+The Fatcat software project licensing policy is to adopt strong copyleft
+licenses for server software (where the majority of software development takes
+place), and permissive licenses for client library and bot framework software,
+and CC-0 (public grant) licensing for declarative interface specifications
+(such as SQL schemas and REST API specifications).
+
+## Privacy Policy
+
+*It is important to note that this section is currently aspirational: the
+servers hosting early deployments of fatcat are largely in a default
+configuration and have not been audited to ensure that these guidelines are
+being followed.*
+
+It is a goal for fatcat to conduct as little surveillence of reader and editor
+bahavior and activities as possible. In pratical terms, this means minimizing
+the overall amount of logging and collection of identifying information. This
+is in contrast to *submitted edit content*, which is captured, preserved, and
+republished as widely as possible.
+
+The general intention is to:
+
+- not use third-party tracking (via extract browser-side requests or
+  javascript)
+- collect aggregate *metrics* (overall hit numbers), but not *log* individual
+  interactions ("this IP visited this page at this time")
+
+Exceptions will likely be made:
+
+- temporary caching of IP addresses may be necessary to implement rate-limiting
+  and debug traffic spikes
+- exception logging, abuse detection, and other exceptional 
+
+Some uncertain areas of privacy include:
+
+- should third-party authenticion identities be linked to editor ids? what
+  about the specific case of ORCiDs if used for login?
+- what about discussion and comments on edits? should conversations be included
+  in full history dumps? should editors be allowed to update or remove
+  comments?
+