From d8cfc17e1e6efae943cf4de0d4d042d43aae57a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bryan Newbold Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 22:55:49 -0700 Subject: hyperdb or HyperDB? --- proposals/0000-hyperdb.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/proposals/0000-hyperdb.md b/proposals/0000-hyperdb.md index c399efb..1f2866f 100644 --- a/proposals/0000-hyperdb.md +++ b/proposals/0000-hyperdb.md @@ -574,6 +574,9 @@ status. Apart from leaving fields in the protobuf message specification, multi-writer concerns are out of scope for this DEP. +Should we use "hyperdb" or "HyperDB"? bnewbold intends to switch to "hyperdb" +in this document before Draft status. + # Changelog [changelog]: #changelog -- cgit v1.2.3