From b33e2abd4ea5395565f1f417d1e897f6654fd16d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laine Walker-Avina Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:41:31 -0700 Subject: toolchain/binutils: Improve arm linking performance Backported a patch from CVS that improves linking times for large projects (eg 700s to 6s). See http://old.nabble.com/-PATCH--Reduce-ARM-linking-time-tt27961038.html for the original. [Peter: add patch header] Signed-off-by: Laine Walker-Avina Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard --- toolchain/binutils/2.20.1/400-arm_link_speed.patch | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++ toolchain/binutils/2.20/400-arm_link_speed.patch | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 366 insertions(+) create mode 100644 toolchain/binutils/2.20.1/400-arm_link_speed.patch create mode 100644 toolchain/binutils/2.20/400-arm_link_speed.patch (limited to 'toolchain') diff --git a/toolchain/binutils/2.20.1/400-arm_link_speed.patch b/toolchain/binutils/2.20.1/400-arm_link_speed.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d03385a13 --- /dev/null +++ b/toolchain/binutils/2.20.1/400-arm_link_speed.patch @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +From Binutils CVS: + +http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c?rev=1.230&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src + +Improves linking time from large projects on ARM. +diff -dupr binutils-2.20.orig/bfd/elf32-arm.c binutils-2.20/bfd/elf32-arm.c +--- binutils-2.20.orig/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2010-04-19 10:08:50.000000000 -0700 ++++ binutils-2.20/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2010-04-19 10:12:45.000000000 -0700 +@@ -12736,108 +12736,15 @@ elf32_arm_section_from_shdr (bfd *abfd, + return TRUE; + } + +-/* A structure used to record a list of sections, independently +- of the next and prev fields in the asection structure. */ +-typedef struct section_list +-{ +- asection * sec; +- struct section_list * next; +- struct section_list * prev; +-} +-section_list; +- +-/* Unfortunately we need to keep a list of sections for which +- an _arm_elf_section_data structure has been allocated. This +- is because it is possible for functions like elf32_arm_write_section +- to be called on a section which has had an elf_data_structure +- allocated for it (and so the used_by_bfd field is valid) but +- for which the ARM extended version of this structure - the +- _arm_elf_section_data structure - has not been allocated. */ +-static section_list * sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = NULL; +- +-static void +-record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec) +-{ +- struct section_list * entry; +- +- entry = bfd_malloc (sizeof (* entry)); +- if (entry == NULL) +- return; +- entry->sec = sec; +- entry->next = sections_with_arm_elf_section_data; +- entry->prev = NULL; +- if (entry->next != NULL) +- entry->next->prev = entry; +- sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = entry; +-} +- +-static struct section_list * +-find_arm_elf_section_entry (asection * sec) +-{ +- struct section_list * entry; +- static struct section_list * last_entry = NULL; +- +- /* This is a short cut for the typical case where the sections are added +- to the sections_with_arm_elf_section_data list in forward order and +- then looked up here in backwards order. This makes a real difference +- to the ld-srec/sec64k.exp linker test. */ +- entry = sections_with_arm_elf_section_data; +- if (last_entry != NULL) +- { +- if (last_entry->sec == sec) +- entry = last_entry; +- else if (last_entry->next != NULL +- && last_entry->next->sec == sec) +- entry = last_entry->next; +- } +- +- for (; entry; entry = entry->next) +- if (entry->sec == sec) +- break; +- +- if (entry) +- /* Record the entry prior to this one - it is the entry we are most +- likely to want to locate next time. Also this way if we have been +- called from unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data() we will not +- be caching a pointer that is about to be freed. */ +- last_entry = entry->prev; +- +- return entry; +-} +- + static _arm_elf_section_data * + get_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec) + { +- struct section_list * entry; +- +- entry = find_arm_elf_section_entry (sec); +- +- if (entry) +- return elf32_arm_section_data (entry->sec); ++ if (sec && sec->owner && is_arm_elf (sec->owner)) ++ return elf32_arm_section_data (sec); + else + return NULL; + } + +-static void +-unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec) +-{ +- struct section_list * entry; +- +- entry = find_arm_elf_section_entry (sec); +- +- if (entry) +- { +- if (entry->prev != NULL) +- entry->prev->next = entry->next; +- if (entry->next != NULL) +- entry->next->prev = entry->prev; +- if (entry == sections_with_arm_elf_section_data) +- sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = entry->next; +- free (entry); +- } +-} +- +- + typedef struct + { + void *finfo; +@@ -13230,8 +13137,6 @@ elf32_arm_new_section_hook (bfd *abfd, a + sec->used_by_bfd = sdata; + } + +- record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec); +- + return _bfd_elf_new_section_hook (abfd, sec); + } + +@@ -13659,44 +13564,13 @@ elf32_arm_write_section (bfd *output_bfd + } + + free (map); +- arm_data->mapcount = 0; ++ arm_data->mapcount = -1; + arm_data->mapsize = 0; + arm_data->map = NULL; +- unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec); + + return FALSE; + } + +-static void +-unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, +- asection * sec, +- void * ignore ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) +-{ +- unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec); +-} +- +-static bfd_boolean +-elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup (bfd * abfd) +-{ +- if (abfd->sections) +- bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, +- unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections, +- NULL); +- +- return _bfd_elf_close_and_cleanup (abfd); +-} +- +-static bfd_boolean +-elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info (bfd * abfd) +-{ +- if (abfd->sections) +- bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, +- unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections, +- NULL); +- +- return _bfd_free_cached_info (abfd); +-} +- + /* Display STT_ARM_TFUNC symbols as functions. */ + + static void +@@ -13882,8 +13756,6 @@ const struct elf_size_info elf32_arm_siz + #define bfd_elf32_find_inliner_info elf32_arm_find_inliner_info + #define bfd_elf32_new_section_hook elf32_arm_new_section_hook + #define bfd_elf32_bfd_is_target_special_symbol elf32_arm_is_target_special_symbol +-#define bfd_elf32_close_and_cleanup elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup +-#define bfd_elf32_bfd_free_cached_info elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info + #define bfd_elf32_bfd_final_link elf32_arm_final_link + + #define elf_backend_get_symbol_type elf32_arm_get_symbol_type diff --git a/toolchain/binutils/2.20/400-arm_link_speed.patch b/toolchain/binutils/2.20/400-arm_link_speed.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d03385a13 --- /dev/null +++ b/toolchain/binutils/2.20/400-arm_link_speed.patch @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +From Binutils CVS: + +http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c?rev=1.230&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src + +Improves linking time from large projects on ARM. +diff -dupr binutils-2.20.orig/bfd/elf32-arm.c binutils-2.20/bfd/elf32-arm.c +--- binutils-2.20.orig/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2010-04-19 10:08:50.000000000 -0700 ++++ binutils-2.20/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2010-04-19 10:12:45.000000000 -0700 +@@ -12736,108 +12736,15 @@ elf32_arm_section_from_shdr (bfd *abfd, + return TRUE; + } + +-/* A structure used to record a list of sections, independently +- of the next and prev fields in the asection structure. */ +-typedef struct section_list +-{ +- asection * sec; +- struct section_list * next; +- struct section_list * prev; +-} +-section_list; +- +-/* Unfortunately we need to keep a list of sections for which +- an _arm_elf_section_data structure has been allocated. This +- is because it is possible for functions like elf32_arm_write_section +- to be called on a section which has had an elf_data_structure +- allocated for it (and so the used_by_bfd field is valid) but +- for which the ARM extended version of this structure - the +- _arm_elf_section_data structure - has not been allocated. */ +-static section_list * sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = NULL; +- +-static void +-record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec) +-{ +- struct section_list * entry; +- +- entry = bfd_malloc (sizeof (* entry)); +- if (entry == NULL) +- return; +- entry->sec = sec; +- entry->next = sections_with_arm_elf_section_data; +- entry->prev = NULL; +- if (entry->next != NULL) +- entry->next->prev = entry; +- sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = entry; +-} +- +-static struct section_list * +-find_arm_elf_section_entry (asection * sec) +-{ +- struct section_list * entry; +- static struct section_list * last_entry = NULL; +- +- /* This is a short cut for the typical case where the sections are added +- to the sections_with_arm_elf_section_data list in forward order and +- then looked up here in backwards order. This makes a real difference +- to the ld-srec/sec64k.exp linker test. */ +- entry = sections_with_arm_elf_section_data; +- if (last_entry != NULL) +- { +- if (last_entry->sec == sec) +- entry = last_entry; +- else if (last_entry->next != NULL +- && last_entry->next->sec == sec) +- entry = last_entry->next; +- } +- +- for (; entry; entry = entry->next) +- if (entry->sec == sec) +- break; +- +- if (entry) +- /* Record the entry prior to this one - it is the entry we are most +- likely to want to locate next time. Also this way if we have been +- called from unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data() we will not +- be caching a pointer that is about to be freed. */ +- last_entry = entry->prev; +- +- return entry; +-} +- + static _arm_elf_section_data * + get_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec) + { +- struct section_list * entry; +- +- entry = find_arm_elf_section_entry (sec); +- +- if (entry) +- return elf32_arm_section_data (entry->sec); ++ if (sec && sec->owner && is_arm_elf (sec->owner)) ++ return elf32_arm_section_data (sec); + else + return NULL; + } + +-static void +-unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec) +-{ +- struct section_list * entry; +- +- entry = find_arm_elf_section_entry (sec); +- +- if (entry) +- { +- if (entry->prev != NULL) +- entry->prev->next = entry->next; +- if (entry->next != NULL) +- entry->next->prev = entry->prev; +- if (entry == sections_with_arm_elf_section_data) +- sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = entry->next; +- free (entry); +- } +-} +- +- + typedef struct + { + void *finfo; +@@ -13230,8 +13137,6 @@ elf32_arm_new_section_hook (bfd *abfd, a + sec->used_by_bfd = sdata; + } + +- record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec); +- + return _bfd_elf_new_section_hook (abfd, sec); + } + +@@ -13659,44 +13564,13 @@ elf32_arm_write_section (bfd *output_bfd + } + + free (map); +- arm_data->mapcount = 0; ++ arm_data->mapcount = -1; + arm_data->mapsize = 0; + arm_data->map = NULL; +- unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec); + + return FALSE; + } + +-static void +-unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, +- asection * sec, +- void * ignore ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) +-{ +- unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec); +-} +- +-static bfd_boolean +-elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup (bfd * abfd) +-{ +- if (abfd->sections) +- bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, +- unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections, +- NULL); +- +- return _bfd_elf_close_and_cleanup (abfd); +-} +- +-static bfd_boolean +-elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info (bfd * abfd) +-{ +- if (abfd->sections) +- bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, +- unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections, +- NULL); +- +- return _bfd_free_cached_info (abfd); +-} +- + /* Display STT_ARM_TFUNC symbols as functions. */ + + static void +@@ -13882,8 +13756,6 @@ const struct elf_size_info elf32_arm_siz + #define bfd_elf32_find_inliner_info elf32_arm_find_inliner_info + #define bfd_elf32_new_section_hook elf32_arm_new_section_hook + #define bfd_elf32_bfd_is_target_special_symbol elf32_arm_is_target_special_symbol +-#define bfd_elf32_close_and_cleanup elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup +-#define bfd_elf32_bfd_free_cached_info elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info + #define bfd_elf32_bfd_final_link elf32_arm_final_link + + #define elf_backend_get_symbol_type elf32_arm_get_symbol_type -- cgit v1.2.3