From ecd23535551d0cd8ae265d75eadc43e88c580fc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Dawson Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 04:54:19 +0000 Subject: manual: minor tweaks Minor grammatical and spelling tweaks to the manual content. Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" Acked-by: Samuel Martin Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard --- docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt | 44 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt') diff --git a/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt b/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt index 6911c55e6..fc75d6627 100644 --- a/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt +++ b/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions & Troubleshooting The boot hangs after 'Starting network...' ------------------------------------------ -If the boot process seems to hand after the following messages +If the boot process seems to hang after the following messages (messages not necessarily exactly similar, depending on the list of packages selected): @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Starting dropbear sshd: generating rsa key... generating dsa key... OK then it means that your system is running, but didn't start a shell on the serial console. In order to have the system start a shell on your -serial console, you have to go in the Buildroot configuration, +System +serial console, you have to go into the Buildroot configuration, +System configuration+, and modify +Port to run a getty (login prompt) on+ and +Baudrate to use+ as appropriate. This will automatically tune the +/etc/inittab+ file of the generated system so that a shell starts on @@ -42,21 +42,21 @@ you should install the +glibc-static+ package. This is because the C library. [[faq-no-compiler-on-target]] -Why there is no compiler on the target? +Why is there no compiler on the target? --------------------------------------- -It has been decided that the support of the _native compiler for the -target_ would be stopped since the Buildroot-2012.11 release because: +It has been decided that support for the _native compiler on the +target_ would be stopped from the Buildroot-2012.11 release because: -* this feature was not maintained nor tested and often broken; +* this feature was neither maintained nor tested, and often broken; * this feature was only available for Buildroot toolchains; * Buildroot mostly targets _small_ or _very small_ target hardware - with limited resource onboard (CPU, ram, mass-storage), on which + with limited resource onboard (CPU, ram, mass-storage), for which compiling does not make much sense. If you need a compiler on your target anyway, then Buildroot is not suitable for your purpose. In such case, you need a _real -distribution_ and you should for something like: +distribution_ and you should opt for something like: * http://www.openembedded.org[openembedded] * https://www.yoctoproject.org[yocto] @@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ distribution_ and you should for something like: * ... [[faq-no-dev-files-on-target]] -Why there is no development files on the target? ------------------------------------------------- +Why are there no development files on the target? +------------------------------------------------- Since there is no compiler available on the target (see xref:faq-no-compiler-on-target[]), it does not make sense to waste @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Therefore, those files are always removed from the target since the Buildroot-2012.11 release. [[faq-no-doc-on-target]] -Why there is no documentation on the target? +Why is there no documentation on the target? -------------------------------------------- Because Buildroot mostly targets _small_ or _very small_ target @@ -101,21 +101,21 @@ semantics. See xref:depends-on-vs-select[]. [[faq-why-not-visible-package]] -Why some packages are not visible in the Buildroot config menu? +Why are some packages not visible in the Buildroot config menu? --------------------------------------------------------------- -If a package exists in the Buildroot tree and does not appears in the +If a package exists in the Buildroot tree and does not appear in the config menu, this most likely means that some of the package's dependencies are not met. -To know more about the dependencies of a package, search the package -symbol using in teh config menu (see xref:make-tips[]). +To know more about the dependencies of a package, search for the +package symbol in the config menu (see xref:make-tips[]). Then, you may have to recursively enable several options (which -correspond to the unmeet dependencies) to finally be able to select +correspond to the unmet dependencies) to finally be able to select the package. -If the package is not visible due to some unmeet toolchain options, +If the package is not visible due to some unmet toolchain options, then you should certainly run a full rebuild (see xref:make-tips[] for more explanations). @@ -123,12 +123,12 @@ more explanations). Why not use the target directory as a chroot directory? ------------------------------------------------------- -There are plenty of reason to *not* use the target directory a chroot +There are plenty of reasons to *not* use the target directory a chroot one, among these: -* files' owners, modes and permissions are not correctly set in the +* file ownerships, modes and permissions are not correctly set in the target directory; -* devices nodes are not created in the target directory. +* device nodes are not created in the target directory. -Because of that, commands run in through chroot, using the target -directory as new root, will fail. +For these reasons, commands run through chroot, using the target +directory as the new root, would fail. -- cgit v1.2.3