Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | tidy up | Mike Frysinger | 2006-09-30 | 1 | -6/+4 |
| | |||||
* | forward port the arm big endian patch | Mike Frysinger | 2006-04-12 | 1 | -0/+67 |
| | |||||
* | use the shared gnuconfig package to update config.sub files rather than ↵ | Mike Frysinger | 2005-11-11 | 1 | -40/+0 |
| | | | | patching them | ||||
* | add alpha/x86_64 support and cleanup sh support | Mike Frysinger | 2005-09-22 | 1 | -60/+40 |
| | |||||
* | Apply the fix for gcc bug #22167 | Eric Andersen | 2005-07-18 | 1 | -0/+16 |
| | | | | | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22167 remove gcc 3.3.3, change config for sjlj exception handling a bit. | ||||
* | Add proper target support for newfangled sh targets. | Paul Mundt | 2005-05-02 | 1 | -0/+49 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | GCC folk in their infinite wisdom have added half-assed target support for newer sh cores. The support is there, but of course we have no way to actually enable the thing, so we do that with this patch. Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either (not even a half-assed attempt, sadly), so we fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise). | ||||
* | Ugly hack to force the configuration for the cross libstdc++ to fail for ↵ | Manuel Novoa III | 2005-05-01 | 1 | -0/+12 |
| | | | | complex funcs we don't yet support. | ||||
* | Add 4.0.0 support. Some arches may still need some tweaking and/or ↵ | Manuel Novoa III | 2005-04-30 | 6 | -0/+3817 |
additional patches. But I successfully built cross and target toolchains for x86 and mipsel supporting c/c++/objective-c/java. Of course I haven't tested them yet... |