| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Udhcp got integrated into busybox a long time ago, and the udhcp package
wasn't even included in package/Config.in, so it couldn't be used.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A C library will have been built by the toolchain makefiles, so there is no
need for packages to explicitly depend on uclibc.
Signed-off-by: Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
not exist; Closes #971
Silly, unchecked sed -i -e "/[^b]zcat/s/zcat/\$\(ZCAT\)/g" $(svngrep "[^b]zcat" * -rl | grep -v Config.in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When gcc 3.4.4 is configured for the toolchain, it subsequently fails to
compile udhcp-0.9.8/dhcpc.c complaining about an improper switch statement
syntax error:
dhcpc.c: In function `perform_renew':
dhcpc.c:136: error: label at end of compound statement
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
general case, therefore, combine the toplevel Makefile options
such as setting TARGETS into the per-package *.mk file
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0000036: [PATCH] udhcpc: Allow build w/o PCMCIA
This patch makes missing PCMCIA config files non-fatal to allow using udhcpc
without pcmcia-cs package
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
directory.
|