| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Xtensa architecture had been removed because it required special
handling and depended on additional directories and files that became
obsolete over time. This change is more aligned to other architectures.
[Thomas: rebased on top of the "arch: improve definition of gcc mtune,
mcpu, etc." patch].
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As stated in commit 555c2585bf28c3ef71f6d2dcdd983d17a19892af, the
Xtensa architecture has been introduced in 2009 and never changed
since its initial introduction. It requires some special handling that
is a bit annoying, and despite our call to the initial developers, and
the announcement of the deprecation of the architecture during the
2012.05, nothing has happened. Therefore, drop support for this
architecture.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: me
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Has been marked as broken for more than 1 year, with no indication
that anyone cares, and it needs a bunch of special handling.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported-By: Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have the generic BR2_HAVE_DEVFILES now.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
'default n' is the default, so there's no need to say it explicitly.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|