summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/toolchain/binutils/2.16.91.0.7/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'toolchain/binutils/2.16.91.0.7/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch')
-rw-r--r--toolchain/binutils/2.16.91.0.7/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch93
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 93 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain/binutils/2.16.91.0.7/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch b/toolchain/binutils/2.16.91.0.7/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9ef7a7c9e..000000000
--- a/toolchain/binutils/2.16.91.0.7/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
-Retrieved from http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00646.html
-Fixes
-localealias.s:544: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
-when building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3
-
-Paths adjusted to match crosstool's patcher.
-
-Message-Id: m3n052qw2g.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de
-From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
-To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
-Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:27:19 +0200
-Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line
-
-Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:
-
-> Index: read.c
-> ===================================================================
-> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/read.c,v
-> retrieving revision 1.76
-> diff -c -3 -p -r1.76 read.c
-> *** read.c 12 Mar 2004 17:48:12 -0000 1.76
-> --- read.c 18 Mar 2004 09:56:05 -0000
-> *************** read_a_source_file (char *name)
-> *** 1053,1059 ****
-> #endif
-> input_line_pointer--;
-> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */
-> ! ignore_rest_of_line ();
-> }
->
-> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook
-> --- 1053,1059 ----
-> #endif
-> input_line_pointer--;
-> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */
-> ! demand_empty_rest_of_line ();
-> }
->
-> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook
-
-This means that the unknown character is no longer ignored, despite the
-comment. As a side effect a line starting with a line comment character
-not followed by APP in NO_APP mode now triggers an error instead of just a
-warning, breaking builds of glibc on m68k-linux. Earlier in
-read_a_source_file where #APP is handled there is another comment that
-claims that unknown comments are ignored, when in fact they aren't (only
-the initial line comment character is skipped).
-
-Note that the presence of #APP will mess up the line counters, but
-that appears to be difficult to fix.
-
-Andreas.
-
-2004-04-23 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
-
- * read.c (read_a_source_file): Ignore unknown text after line
- comment character. Fix misleading comment.
-
---- binutils/gas/read.c.~1.78.~ 2004-04-23 08:58:23.000000000 +0200
-+++ binutils/gas/read.c 2004-04-23 21:49:01.000000000 +0200
-@@ -950,10 +950,14 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name)
- unsigned int new_length;
- char *tmp_buf = 0;
-
-- bump_line_counters ();
- s = input_line_pointer;
- if (strncmp (s, "APP\n", 4))
-- continue; /* We ignore it */
-+ {
-+ /* We ignore it */
-+ ignore_rest_of_line ();
-+ continue;
-+ }
-+ bump_line_counters ();
- s += 4;
-
- sb_new (&sbuf);
-@@ -1052,7 +1056,7 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name)
- continue;
- #endif
- input_line_pointer--;
-- /* Report unknown char as ignored. */
-+ /* Report unknown char as error. */
- demand_empty_rest_of_line ();
- }
-
-
---
-Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
-SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstra&#xC3;e 5, 90409 N&#xC3;rnberg, Germany
-Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
-"And now for something completely different."