diff options
author | Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> | 2013-04-22 11:47:47 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk> | 2013-04-23 09:00:01 +0200 |
commit | 61eea455be3ac10fa40099b811830673d18f546e (patch) | |
tree | a2f4f105d5568995eb8d5cdc8c2c1e5cc16453a6 /package/binutils/2.22 | |
parent | 246d12b5b49c045b6c74ea18ebb53778692a7e3f (diff) | |
download | buildroot-novena-61eea455be3ac10fa40099b811830673d18f546e.tar.gz buildroot-novena-61eea455be3ac10fa40099b811830673d18f546e.zip |
binutils: move patches to new model
On commit 5538e4766201aa0c1c23721cfc99cbbde595964b the versioned package
patches changed the directory structure but the packages weren't fixed.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'package/binutils/2.22')
-rw-r--r-- | package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch | 29 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch | 24 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch | 21 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch | 80 |
5 files changed, 190 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ea3d1b606 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +r10231 | lethal | 2005-05-02 09:58:00 -0400 (Mon, 02 May 2005) | 13 lines + +Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either, so we +fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for +sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more +inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise). + +--- a/configure ++++ b/configure +@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ + mips*-*-*) + noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof" + ;; +- sh-*-* | sh64-*-*) ++ sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*) + case "${target}" in + sh*-*-elf) + ;; +--- a/configure.ac ++++ b/configure.ac +@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ + mips*-*-*) + noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof" + ;; +- sh-*-* | sh64-*-*) ++ sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*) + case "${target}" in + sh*-*-elf) + ;; diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5cb0f614d --- /dev/null +++ b/package/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +diff -u binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.am binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.am +--- binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.am 2007-06-18 19:29:29.000000000 +0200 ++++ binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.am 2007-06-25 10:00:36.000000000 +0200 +@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ + # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts. + # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR + # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers. +-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib ++scriptdir = $(libdir) + + EMUL = @EMUL@ + EMULATION_OFILES = @EMULATION_OFILES@ +diff -u binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.in binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.in +--- binutils-2.17.50.0.17.oorig/ld/Makefile.in 2007-06-18 19:29:29.000000000 +0200 ++++ binutils-2.17.50.0.17/ld/Makefile.in 2007-06-25 10:00:36.000000000 +0200 +@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ + # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts. + # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR + # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers. +-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib ++scriptdir = $(libdir) + BASEDIR = $(srcdir)/.. + BFDDIR = $(BASEDIR)/bfd + INCDIR = $(BASEDIR)/include diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..df783109b --- /dev/null +++ b/package/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +diff -Nura binutils-2.21.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.21/ld/emultempl/elf32.em +--- binutils-2.21.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2010-10-29 09:10:36.000000000 -0300 ++++ binutils-2.21/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2010-12-10 09:26:56.746102724 -0300 +@@ -1270,6 +1270,8 @@ + && command_line.rpath == NULL) + { + lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH"); ++ if ((lib_path) && (strlen (lib_path) == 0)) ++ lib_path = NULL; + if (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_search_needed (lib_path, &n, + force)) + break; +@@ -1497,6 +1499,8 @@ + rpath = command_line.rpath; + if (rpath == NULL) + rpath = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH"); ++ if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0)) ++ rpath = NULL; + + for (abfd = link_info.input_bfds; abfd; abfd = abfd->link_next) + if (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour) diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d21e4cb10 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/binutils/2.22/500-sysroot.patch @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +Signed-off-by: Sven Rebhan <odinshorse@googlemail.com> + +Always try to prepend the sysroot prefix to absolute filenames first. + +http://bugs.gentoo.org/275666 +http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10340 + +--- a/ld/ldfile.c ++++ b/ld/ldfile.c +@@ -308,18 +308,24 @@ + directory first. */ + if (! entry->is_archive) + { +- if (entry->sysrooted && IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (entry->filename)) ++ /* For absolute pathnames, try to always open the file in the ++ sysroot first. If this fails, try to open the file at the ++ given location. */ ++ entry->sysrooted = is_sysrooted_pathname(entry->filename, FALSE); ++ if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (entry->filename) && ld_sysroot && ! entry->sysrooted) + { + char *name = concat (ld_sysroot, entry->filename, + (const char *) NULL); + if (ldfile_try_open_bfd (name, entry)) + { + entry->filename = name; ++ entry->sysrooted = TRUE; + return TRUE; + } + free (name); + } +- else if (ldfile_try_open_bfd (entry->filename, entry)) ++ ++ if (ldfile_try_open_bfd (entry->filename, entry)) + { + entry->sysrooted = IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (entry->filename) + && is_sysrooted_pathname (entry->filename, TRUE); diff --git a/package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch b/package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c1efacf24 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645 +http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470 + +2011-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> + + PR ld/13470 + * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive + change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment. + * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise. + +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v +retrieving revision 1.302.2.1 +retrieving revision 1.302.2.2 +diff -u -r1.302.2.1 -r1.302.2.2 +--- src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011/11/15 11:36:52 1.302.2.1 ++++ src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011/12/03 00:58:01 1.302.2.2 +@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; + edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed; + +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) +- return; +- + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) + { + if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL) +@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; + } + ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS ++ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the ++ DIR sym here. */ ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) ++ return; ++ + /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to + the symbol which just became indirect. */ + edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount; +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c,v +retrieving revision 1.363.2.4 +retrieving revision 1.363.2.5 +diff -u -r1.363.2.4 -r1.363.2.5 +--- src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011/11/08 13:46:36 1.363.2.4 ++++ src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011/12/03 00:58:02 1.363.2.5 +@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ + edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak; + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; + +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) +- return; +- + /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */ + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) + { +@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; + } + ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS ++ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the ++ DIR sym here. */ ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) ++ return; ++ + /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the + symbol which just became indirect. */ + if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL) |