From f61026119df4700f69eb73e95620bc5928ca0fcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: User Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:52:09 +0000 Subject: Grand rename for gitit transfer --- tmp/Newcomb paradox | 65 ----------------------------- tmp/Newcomb paradox.page | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tmp/SCUBA | 83 ------------------------------------- tmp/SCUBA.page | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tmp/Saccade | 7 ---- tmp/Saccade.page | 7 ++++ tmp/Teaching CS | 97 -------------------------------------------- tmp/Teaching CS.page | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tmp/Topics of Curiosity | 50 ----------------------- tmp/Topics of Curiosity.page | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++ tmp/artists | 9 ---- tmp/artists.page | 9 ++++ tmp/sql | 8 ---- tmp/sql.page | 8 ++++ 14 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 319 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 tmp/Newcomb paradox create mode 100644 tmp/Newcomb paradox.page delete mode 100644 tmp/SCUBA create mode 100644 tmp/SCUBA.page delete mode 100644 tmp/Saccade create mode 100644 tmp/Saccade.page delete mode 100644 tmp/Teaching CS create mode 100644 tmp/Teaching CS.page delete mode 100644 tmp/Topics of Curiosity create mode 100644 tmp/Topics of Curiosity.page delete mode 100644 tmp/artists create mode 100644 tmp/artists.page delete mode 100644 tmp/sql create mode 100644 tmp/sql.page (limited to 'tmp') diff --git a/tmp/Newcomb paradox b/tmp/Newcomb paradox deleted file mode 100644 index c7da22b..0000000 --- a/tmp/Newcomb paradox +++ /dev/null @@ -1,65 +0,0 @@ -================== -Newcomb's Dialemma -================== - -Newcomb's paradox was thought up by a researcher named Newcomb; it was first -explored and written up by Robert Nozick in the 1969 paper -"Newcomb's Problem and Two principles of Choice". - -The Situation -------------- -As narrated by an all knowing "predictor":: - - I am going to give you a choice. It is important to know that I really - pretty much know what you are going to do. I have been watching their whole - life and am additionally an immortal being; i've been doing this a long - time and always guess correctly. It's also important to know that I am - unbiased and don't care which decision you make, I have nothing to gain - either way. - - Here are two boxes: a large and a small. The small has a 10 shekel coin - in it (show everybody). The large one may or may not have a thousand - shekels in it; you don't know. Your choice is to either take only the - large box or to take both the large and small boxes. The twist is that - I already knew which decision you will make and decided whether or not - to put the $1000 in the large box or not based on that knowledge. - If I knew you would "two box", then I left the large box empty. If I knew - you would "one box" then I filled it. - -Dominance Mindset ------------------ -Regardless of what decision was made previously, and whether or not there -is anything in the large box, the person is better off taking both boxes; -either they will get just $10 (better than none) or $1010 (better -than $1000). So two-box. - -Trusting Mindset ----------------- -The predictor is pretty much always right so we can just ignore the -possibility that they are wrong. In this case, choosing to one-box -implies that the Predictor knew you would and you get $1000; -choosing to two-box implies that the predictor knew you would and you -only get $10. - -The predictor doesn't even have to be perfectly accurate; say they are -90%: -If you one-box, your expected value is $900. -If you two-box, your expected value is $110. - -Discussion ----------- -It's disputed whether this is a paradox, and there are many deeper arguments -that I don't have time to go into here. Ultimately, I am a one-boxer -though this is something of a minority position. - -Afterword ---------- -The person who taught me this paradox, Professor Augustin Rayo, a -two-boxer, then had this to add. He was talking with his one-boxing friend -and accused her of letting irrationality undermine her logic: she is so -optimistic that if a statement S is unprovable, but it would be nicer if S -was true than false, then she pretens that S is proven. So basically, even -though there is no rationalization, she will accept a statement "just -because it would be nice", and this isn't how logic works. To which she -replied "but wouldn't it be nice if it was?". - diff --git a/tmp/Newcomb paradox.page b/tmp/Newcomb paradox.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c7da22b --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/Newcomb paradox.page @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +================== +Newcomb's Dialemma +================== + +Newcomb's paradox was thought up by a researcher named Newcomb; it was first +explored and written up by Robert Nozick in the 1969 paper +"Newcomb's Problem and Two principles of Choice". + +The Situation +------------- +As narrated by an all knowing "predictor":: + + I am going to give you a choice. It is important to know that I really + pretty much know what you are going to do. I have been watching their whole + life and am additionally an immortal being; i've been doing this a long + time and always guess correctly. It's also important to know that I am + unbiased and don't care which decision you make, I have nothing to gain + either way. + + Here are two boxes: a large and a small. The small has a 10 shekel coin + in it (show everybody). The large one may or may not have a thousand + shekels in it; you don't know. Your choice is to either take only the + large box or to take both the large and small boxes. The twist is that + I already knew which decision you will make and decided whether or not + to put the $1000 in the large box or not based on that knowledge. + If I knew you would "two box", then I left the large box empty. If I knew + you would "one box" then I filled it. + +Dominance Mindset +----------------- +Regardless of what decision was made previously, and whether or not there +is anything in the large box, the person is better off taking both boxes; +either they will get just $10 (better than none) or $1010 (better +than $1000). So two-box. + +Trusting Mindset +---------------- +The predictor is pretty much always right so we can just ignore the +possibility that they are wrong. In this case, choosing to one-box +implies that the Predictor knew you would and you get $1000; +choosing to two-box implies that the predictor knew you would and you +only get $10. + +The predictor doesn't even have to be perfectly accurate; say they are +90%: +If you one-box, your expected value is $900. +If you two-box, your expected value is $110. + +Discussion +---------- +It's disputed whether this is a paradox, and there are many deeper arguments +that I don't have time to go into here. Ultimately, I am a one-boxer +though this is something of a minority position. + +Afterword +--------- +The person who taught me this paradox, Professor Augustin Rayo, a +two-boxer, then had this to add. He was talking with his one-boxing friend +and accused her of letting irrationality undermine her logic: she is so +optimistic that if a statement S is unprovable, but it would be nicer if S +was true than false, then she pretens that S is proven. So basically, even +though there is no rationalization, she will accept a statement "just +because it would be nice", and this isn't how logic works. To which she +replied "but wouldn't it be nice if it was?". + diff --git a/tmp/SCUBA b/tmp/SCUBA deleted file mode 100644 index 84d1345..0000000 --- a/tmp/SCUBA +++ /dev/null @@ -1,83 +0,0 @@ -============ -SCUBA Diving -============ ---------------------------------------------- -Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus ---------------------------------------------- - -SCUBA stands for "Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus". -One of the primary organization regulating recreational SCUBA diving is -PADI (the Professional Association of Diving Instructors). - -Equipment ---------- - -:BCD: The buoyancy control device is basically an inflatable live vest - that you can inflate using the regulator (or by mouth) to control - your buoyancy. Your buoyancy changes as you use up air (tank gets - lighter for same volume displaced), inhale/exhale, swim in water - of different temperature or salinity, or change depth: increased - pressure compresses any flexible air pockets, including the BCD - itself, neoprene foam, or a dry-suit. - Most BCDs have their own pressure hoses coming from the first stage - regulator that supply air. - Sometimes there is only one vent valve, which has to be at the - highest orientation or air will not vent out of the bladders. -:Tank: Most tanks are made of steel or aluminum and can store compressed - air of up to 3000psi. They are stored at pressure to prevent moisture - from leaking in. There is a valve built into the tank itself that - usually gets taken apart and repaired every two years. Tanks - can last for decades even with heavy use; they are pressure tested - for fatigue and leaks. -:Regulator: The first-stage regulator is connected to the tank and steps - the pressure down to about 250psi above the surrounding/ambient - pressure. Hoses carry air at this mid-level pressure to the second - stage regulator/mouthpiece, which steps the pressure down to - about what is in your lungs. Depending on the regulator they can - be stiff (you have to suck a bit to get air, but then it rushes - in with force) or very natural feeling (air comes very smoothly - on inhalation and doesn't press into your lungs). -:Alternate: These days almost everybody carries a second regulator mouthpiece - for emergencies. These are always on and ready to breath from, - but usually stiffer so they don't free-flow as often. -:Dive Computer: - A dive computer monitors time and depth to give you an accurate picture - of how much excess nitrogen is in a diver's bloodstream. By - continuously integrating they usually "give more time at depth" than - hand calculations using tables (which err towards safety). -:Dry Suit: A dry suit is a sealed and air tight, keeping the diver's skin dry. - Extra insulation is needed to give warmth underneath. Some dry - suits are made of compressed neoprene. - A dry suit has to be constantly adjusted with tank air just like - the BCD to maintain inflation and buoyancy. -:Wet Suit: Wet suits work on the principle of holding water against the skin: - a diver's body warms this water and stays cozy as long as water - flow is restricted enough. Even little bit too much flow through - wrist or ankle openings can be very cold. - - -Depths ------- -A PADI Open Water Diving course gives a recommended limit of 20m/60ft. -A "deep dive adventure course" gives a recommended limit of 30m/100ft, -and additional experience gives a limit of 40m/130ft. - -With careful decompression stops and enriched compressed air (higher oxygen -content) it's possible to reach depths of hundreds of meters. Sometimes -commercial divers will dive for many hours using surface supplied air, -then live at the surface in a compression chamber overnight between dives -to stay at the same pressure [*]_. - -History -------- -I'm pretty sure `Jacques Cousteau`_ invented the aqualung, which is the basis -for modern diving, but I'll have to check. - -.. _Jacques Cousteau: /k/jacquescousteau/ - -Flying ------- -After a regular no-decompression dive, wait at least 12 -hours before flying (or going to high altitude, eg over 300m). - -.. [*] Need a citation, heard this word of mouth diff --git a/tmp/SCUBA.page b/tmp/SCUBA.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..84d1345 --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/SCUBA.page @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +============ +SCUBA Diving +============ +--------------------------------------------- +Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus +--------------------------------------------- + +SCUBA stands for "Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus". +One of the primary organization regulating recreational SCUBA diving is +PADI (the Professional Association of Diving Instructors). + +Equipment +--------- + +:BCD: The buoyancy control device is basically an inflatable live vest + that you can inflate using the regulator (or by mouth) to control + your buoyancy. Your buoyancy changes as you use up air (tank gets + lighter for same volume displaced), inhale/exhale, swim in water + of different temperature or salinity, or change depth: increased + pressure compresses any flexible air pockets, including the BCD + itself, neoprene foam, or a dry-suit. + Most BCDs have their own pressure hoses coming from the first stage + regulator that supply air. + Sometimes there is only one vent valve, which has to be at the + highest orientation or air will not vent out of the bladders. +:Tank: Most tanks are made of steel or aluminum and can store compressed + air of up to 3000psi. They are stored at pressure to prevent moisture + from leaking in. There is a valve built into the tank itself that + usually gets taken apart and repaired every two years. Tanks + can last for decades even with heavy use; they are pressure tested + for fatigue and leaks. +:Regulator: The first-stage regulator is connected to the tank and steps + the pressure down to about 250psi above the surrounding/ambient + pressure. Hoses carry air at this mid-level pressure to the second + stage regulator/mouthpiece, which steps the pressure down to + about what is in your lungs. Depending on the regulator they can + be stiff (you have to suck a bit to get air, but then it rushes + in with force) or very natural feeling (air comes very smoothly + on inhalation and doesn't press into your lungs). +:Alternate: These days almost everybody carries a second regulator mouthpiece + for emergencies. These are always on and ready to breath from, + but usually stiffer so they don't free-flow as often. +:Dive Computer: + A dive computer monitors time and depth to give you an accurate picture + of how much excess nitrogen is in a diver's bloodstream. By + continuously integrating they usually "give more time at depth" than + hand calculations using tables (which err towards safety). +:Dry Suit: A dry suit is a sealed and air tight, keeping the diver's skin dry. + Extra insulation is needed to give warmth underneath. Some dry + suits are made of compressed neoprene. + A dry suit has to be constantly adjusted with tank air just like + the BCD to maintain inflation and buoyancy. +:Wet Suit: Wet suits work on the principle of holding water against the skin: + a diver's body warms this water and stays cozy as long as water + flow is restricted enough. Even little bit too much flow through + wrist or ankle openings can be very cold. + + +Depths +------ +A PADI Open Water Diving course gives a recommended limit of 20m/60ft. +A "deep dive adventure course" gives a recommended limit of 30m/100ft, +and additional experience gives a limit of 40m/130ft. + +With careful decompression stops and enriched compressed air (higher oxygen +content) it's possible to reach depths of hundreds of meters. Sometimes +commercial divers will dive for many hours using surface supplied air, +then live at the surface in a compression chamber overnight between dives +to stay at the same pressure [*]_. + +History +------- +I'm pretty sure `Jacques Cousteau`_ invented the aqualung, which is the basis +for modern diving, but I'll have to check. + +.. _Jacques Cousteau: /k/jacquescousteau/ + +Flying +------ +After a regular no-decompression dive, wait at least 12 +hours before flying (or going to high altitude, eg over 300m). + +.. [*] Need a citation, heard this word of mouth diff --git a/tmp/Saccade b/tmp/Saccade deleted file mode 100644 index 85693c6..0000000 --- a/tmp/Saccade +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -Saccade -------- - -Saccades are small movements of the eye which generate a delta in our stream -of vision. Similar to the phenomena of "only seeing movement". - -(based on Jeff Hawkin's book "On Intelligence") diff --git a/tmp/Saccade.page b/tmp/Saccade.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..85693c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/Saccade.page @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +Saccade +------- + +Saccades are small movements of the eye which generate a delta in our stream +of vision. Similar to the phenomena of "only seeing movement". + +(based on Jeff Hawkin's book "On Intelligence") diff --git a/tmp/Teaching CS b/tmp/Teaching CS deleted file mode 100644 index 2c21cc4..0000000 --- a/tmp/Teaching CS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,97 +0,0 @@ -==================================== -Notes on Teaching Computer Science -==================================== - -:author: Bryan Newbold - -.. note:: Incomplete, just a structure of starting topics - -.. contents:: - -In thinking about how to teach somebody new "how to program" or "about -computers", it seems like getting the rough big picture is the best first step. - - -Engineering and Scientific Philosophies ------------------------------------------ -keywords: computation, computability, hierarchy, interface, implementation - -In approaching computer science it is important to note an arbitrary division -of the field between "computation" and "computability" that has arisen over -the years. Similar to the "theory" vs "experiment" schisms in other scientific -fields like physics, "computation" puts emphasis on actually generating -hardware and software to run in the real world, while "computability" focuses -on what can be computed and generalizations of specific computations. Of course -they are two sides of the same coin and should be appreciated together. - -It is almost impossible to deal with computer systems (hardware or software) -without breaking them up into modules and layers. Perhaps more so than in any -other field, conceptual barriers are reflected in the actual design and -implementation of systems, which can make it hard to learn how things work -because their inner workings are shielded from view both literally and -figuratively. For example, a software developer writing a web browser doesn't -have to know about what kind of monitor the user is sitting in front of, -what kind of physical link to the internet they have (or even how this -connection is managed), the details of their computer architecture, how their -application is delegated computing resources, what kind of mouse is being used, -etc etc. - -A more formal example is the ethernet protocol, which is used to -pass data between nodes in a relatively unstructured network. The ethernet -protocol itself lies above the physical "link layer", which means the same -protocol can be used for wireless radio communications or with conducting -wires. It lies below any sort of higher network layers and far below the -"application layer", so large amounts of data can be streamed over it between -two nodes, or messages between dozens of nodes can be passed over it, or it -can be only one link in a very large web of interconnections. This flexibility -has made it ubiquitous and is the protocol most network devices use without -a hitch, but occasionally it's imperfections can lead to problems at higher -levels which are hard to track down. - -Turing Completeness ------------------------------------------ -keywords: finite state machine, deterministic - -Personal Computer Hierarchy ------------------------------------------ -keywords: CPU, RAM, hard disk, peripherals, network, BIOS, motherboard, - operating system, serial, parallel, interrupts, multicore, register - -UNIX Operating Systems ------------------------------------------ -keywords: file system, kernel, driver, threading, - -UNIX is the Latin of operating systems: there were operating systems that came -after, and the average user isn't running a UNIX operating system, but it's -design is simple, functional, and has represents the dominant paradigms for -modern (non-experimental or special use) operating systems. - -As some context, Microsoft Windows is not directly based on UNIX. Apple OSX -and subsequent versions is built on top of a UNIX core. Linux is an open source -implementation of UNIX. BSD was the free UC Berkeley distribution of UNIX which -has branched off into open source implementations like FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and -NetBSD. "UNIX" got started as a Bell Labs research project in the 70's (?) - - -The Internet ------------------------------------------ -keywords: IP (internet protocol), ARP, MAC, routing, servers, backbone, - protocol, email, http, html - - -Software Development Tools ------------------------------------------ -keywords: compiler, lexical analysis, library, language, interpreter - - -Data Formats, Structures, and Algorithms ------------------------------------------ -keywords: string, integer, bit, list, pointer, tree, sort, P/NP - - -Design Paradigms ------------------------------------------ -keywords: server/client, object oriented, wrappers, KISS, parallelization, - resource locking, serialization, buffer - - diff --git a/tmp/Teaching CS.page b/tmp/Teaching CS.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2c21cc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/Teaching CS.page @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +==================================== +Notes on Teaching Computer Science +==================================== + +:author: Bryan Newbold + +.. note:: Incomplete, just a structure of starting topics + +.. contents:: + +In thinking about how to teach somebody new "how to program" or "about +computers", it seems like getting the rough big picture is the best first step. + + +Engineering and Scientific Philosophies +----------------------------------------- +keywords: computation, computability, hierarchy, interface, implementation + +In approaching computer science it is important to note an arbitrary division +of the field between "computation" and "computability" that has arisen over +the years. Similar to the "theory" vs "experiment" schisms in other scientific +fields like physics, "computation" puts emphasis on actually generating +hardware and software to run in the real world, while "computability" focuses +on what can be computed and generalizations of specific computations. Of course +they are two sides of the same coin and should be appreciated together. + +It is almost impossible to deal with computer systems (hardware or software) +without breaking them up into modules and layers. Perhaps more so than in any +other field, conceptual barriers are reflected in the actual design and +implementation of systems, which can make it hard to learn how things work +because their inner workings are shielded from view both literally and +figuratively. For example, a software developer writing a web browser doesn't +have to know about what kind of monitor the user is sitting in front of, +what kind of physical link to the internet they have (or even how this +connection is managed), the details of their computer architecture, how their +application is delegated computing resources, what kind of mouse is being used, +etc etc. + +A more formal example is the ethernet protocol, which is used to +pass data between nodes in a relatively unstructured network. The ethernet +protocol itself lies above the physical "link layer", which means the same +protocol can be used for wireless radio communications or with conducting +wires. It lies below any sort of higher network layers and far below the +"application layer", so large amounts of data can be streamed over it between +two nodes, or messages between dozens of nodes can be passed over it, or it +can be only one link in a very large web of interconnections. This flexibility +has made it ubiquitous and is the protocol most network devices use without +a hitch, but occasionally it's imperfections can lead to problems at higher +levels which are hard to track down. + +Turing Completeness +----------------------------------------- +keywords: finite state machine, deterministic + +Personal Computer Hierarchy +----------------------------------------- +keywords: CPU, RAM, hard disk, peripherals, network, BIOS, motherboard, + operating system, serial, parallel, interrupts, multicore, register + +UNIX Operating Systems +----------------------------------------- +keywords: file system, kernel, driver, threading, + +UNIX is the Latin of operating systems: there were operating systems that came +after, and the average user isn't running a UNIX operating system, but it's +design is simple, functional, and has represents the dominant paradigms for +modern (non-experimental or special use) operating systems. + +As some context, Microsoft Windows is not directly based on UNIX. Apple OSX +and subsequent versions is built on top of a UNIX core. Linux is an open source +implementation of UNIX. BSD was the free UC Berkeley distribution of UNIX which +has branched off into open source implementations like FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and +NetBSD. "UNIX" got started as a Bell Labs research project in the 70's (?) + + +The Internet +----------------------------------------- +keywords: IP (internet protocol), ARP, MAC, routing, servers, backbone, + protocol, email, http, html + + +Software Development Tools +----------------------------------------- +keywords: compiler, lexical analysis, library, language, interpreter + + +Data Formats, Structures, and Algorithms +----------------------------------------- +keywords: string, integer, bit, list, pointer, tree, sort, P/NP + + +Design Paradigms +----------------------------------------- +keywords: server/client, object oriented, wrappers, KISS, parallelization, + resource locking, serialization, buffer + + diff --git a/tmp/Topics of Curiosity b/tmp/Topics of Curiosity deleted file mode 100644 index 6ef2976..0000000 --- a/tmp/Topics of Curiosity +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ ---------------------- -Topics of Curiosity ---------------------- - -*or, list of future knowledge items* - -* United Nations -* List of International Treaties - - including signatories - -* Ethernet -* Benthic Biology -* Antarctica -* Kyoto Protocol -* Sensory Deprivation -* Beat Authors -* Harvey Mudd -* National Science Foundation - - And other US national science organizations - -* Iraq War - - Strategy, costs, political figures, history, technology, prospects, companies, etc. - -* Recycling -* Pollution sources in the United States -* US Education System -* US Judicial Branch -* Kennedy School of Government -* Democratic Party -* Republican Party -* Green Party -* Bob Dole -* Al Gore -* Obama -* Book Publishing -* Internet - - Power consumption, user numbers, global connectivity, core and backbone services - -* One Laptop Per Child - - Bundled knowledge, regions, implementation plans, new software concepts, connectivity - -* Paul Dirac -* LaTeX -* vim -* pykrete diff --git a/tmp/Topics of Curiosity.page b/tmp/Topics of Curiosity.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ef2976 --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/Topics of Curiosity.page @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +--------------------- +Topics of Curiosity +--------------------- + +*or, list of future knowledge items* + +* United Nations +* List of International Treaties + + including signatories + +* Ethernet +* Benthic Biology +* Antarctica +* Kyoto Protocol +* Sensory Deprivation +* Beat Authors +* Harvey Mudd +* National Science Foundation + + And other US national science organizations + +* Iraq War + + Strategy, costs, political figures, history, technology, prospects, companies, etc. + +* Recycling +* Pollution sources in the United States +* US Education System +* US Judicial Branch +* Kennedy School of Government +* Democratic Party +* Republican Party +* Green Party +* Bob Dole +* Al Gore +* Obama +* Book Publishing +* Internet + + Power consumption, user numbers, global connectivity, core and backbone services + +* One Laptop Per Child + + Bundled knowledge, regions, implementation plans, new software concepts, connectivity + +* Paul Dirac +* LaTeX +* vim +* pykrete diff --git a/tmp/artists b/tmp/artists deleted file mode 100644 index a7b9751..0000000 --- a/tmp/artists +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ - -======= -Artists -======= - -* Kay Sage (1898-1963), American Surrealist Painter -* Yves Tanguy (1900-1955), French Surrealist Painter -* Hans Bellmer (1902-1975), French. "Die Puppe" series (dolls) -* Francis Picabia (1879-1953) French Painter diff --git a/tmp/artists.page b/tmp/artists.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a7b9751 --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/artists.page @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ + +======= +Artists +======= + +* Kay Sage (1898-1963), American Surrealist Painter +* Yves Tanguy (1900-1955), French Surrealist Painter +* Hans Bellmer (1902-1975), French. "Die Puppe" series (dolls) +* Francis Picabia (1879-1953) French Painter diff --git a/tmp/sql b/tmp/sql deleted file mode 100644 index 4936bc9..0000000 --- a/tmp/sql +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -=================================== -SQL: Structured Query Language -=================================== - - -SELECT ---------- -Eg, ``SELECT * From table_name``. ``DISTINCT`` returns no duplicates. diff --git a/tmp/sql.page b/tmp/sql.page new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4936bc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/tmp/sql.page @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +=================================== +SQL: Structured Query Language +=================================== + + +SELECT +--------- +Eg, ``SELECT * From table_name``. ``DISTINCT`` returns no duplicates. -- cgit v1.2.3