From 226b1e9aabc4a557cd522f4488d9e03492e367f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bnewbold <bnewbold@robocracy.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:42:50 -0400
Subject: formatting fixes

---
 software/c.page | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

(limited to 'software/c.page')

diff --git a/software/c.page b/software/c.page
index 910a5de..ec02db6 100644
--- a/software/c.page
+++ b/software/c.page
@@ -10,19 +10,19 @@ automagically. Eg, ``p+3`` -> ``0xFEFE0000 + 3 * (sizeof foo)``.
 
 Examples of tricky pointer sytax::
 
-  int *ip;  
-  (++*p)
-  (*p++)
-  ++(*p)
-  *(++p)
+    int *ip;  
+    (++*p)
+    (*p++)
+    ++(*p)
+    *(++p)
 
 In the context of references like function declarations, only the size of the
 first dimension of a multi-dimensional array is free; the others must be
 specified explicitly::
 
-  void copy_2d_array(int a[][10], int b[][10]); // Ok
-  void copy_2d_array(int a[][],   int b[][]);   // Invalid
-  void copy_2d_array(int a[10][], int b[10][]); // Invalid
+    void copy_2d_array(int a[][10], int b[][10]); // Ok
+    void copy_2d_array(int a[][],   int b[][]);   // Invalid
+    void copy_2d_array(int a[10][], int b[10][]); // Invalid
 
 Negative indexing of arrays is "allowed" (reads ahead of the array in memory);
 need to check for that case explicitly.
@@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ The "update statement" of a for loop gets executed at the /end/ of every loop,
 which means an iteration variable gets updated once more than might be
 expected::
 
-  int i;
-  for(i = 0; i < 10; i++) { 
-    } 
-  printf("%d\n", i); // prints 10, not 9
+    int i;
+    for(i = 0; i < 10; i++) { 
+        } 
+    printf("%d\n", i); // prints 10, not 9
 
 Any 'inline' should probably be 'static' (local linkage). 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3