summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/syntest1.scm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBryan Newbold <bnewbold@robocracy.org>2017-02-20 00:05:26 -0800
committerBryan Newbold <bnewbold@robocracy.org>2017-02-20 00:05:26 -0800
commitdeda2c0fd8689349fea2a900199a76ff7ecb319e (patch)
treec9726d54a0806a9b0c75e6c82db8692aea0053cf /syntest1.scm
parent3278b75942bdbe706f7a0fba87729bb1e935b68b (diff)
downloadscm-deda2c0fd8689349fea2a900199a76ff7ecb319e.tar.gz
scm-deda2c0fd8689349fea2a900199a76ff7ecb319e.zip
Import Upstream version 5d6upstream/5d6
Diffstat (limited to 'syntest1.scm')
-rw-r--r--syntest1.scm166
1 files changed, 166 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/syntest1.scm b/syntest1.scm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f10be86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/syntest1.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+;Most of the tests themselves are taken from William Clinger's reference
+;implementation of syntax-rules, `macros.will' in the Scheme repository
+;at ftp.cs.indiana.edu
+
+;Copyright 1992 William Clinger
+
+;Permission to copy this software, in whole or in part, to use this
+;software for any lawful purpose, and to redistribute this software
+;is granted subject to the restriction that all copies made of this
+;software must include this copyright notice in full.
+
+;I also request that you send me a copy of any improvements that you
+;make to this software so that they may be incorporated within it to
+;the benefit of the Scheme community.
+
+
+(require 'macro)
+
+(define synerrs '())
+
+(define-syntax test
+ (syntax-rules ()
+ ((test ?exp ?ans)
+ (begin
+ (display '?exp)
+ (display " ==> ")
+ (let* ((exp (copy-tree '?exp))
+ (x ?exp)
+ #+f(x (eval (macro:expand '?exp)))
+ )
+ (display x)
+ (newline)
+ (or (equal? x ?ans)
+ (begin
+ (set! synerrs
+ (cons (list x ?ans '?exp) synerrs))
+ (display "ERROR: expected ")
+ (display ?ans)
+ (newline))))))
+ ((test ?exp0 ?exp1 ?exp2 ...)
+ (begin (display '?exp0)
+ (newline)
+ ?exp0 (test ?exp1 ?exp2 ...)))))
+
+(test (let ((x 'outer))
+ (let-syntax ((m (syntax-rules () ((m) x))))
+ (let ((x 'inner))
+ (m))))
+ 'outer)
+
+(test (let-syntax ((when (syntax-rules
+ ()
+ ((when ?test ?stmt1 ?stmt2 ...)
+ (if ?test (begin ?stmt1 ?stmt2 ...))))))
+ (let ((if #t))
+ (when if (set! if 'now))
+ if))
+ 'now)
+
+(test (letrec-syntax
+ ((or (syntax-rules
+ ()
+ ((or) #f)
+ ((or ?e) ?e)
+ ((or ?e1 ?e2 ...)
+ (let ((temp ?e1))
+ (if temp temp (or ?e2 ...)))))))
+ (let ((x #f)
+ (y 7)
+ (temp 8)
+ (let odd?)
+ (if even?))
+ (or x
+ (let temp)
+ (if y)
+ y)))
+ 7)
+
+(test (let ((=> #f))
+ (cond (#t => 'ok)))
+ 'ok)
+
+; This syntax of set*! matches that of an example in the R4RS.
+; That example was put forth as an example of a hygienic macro
+; that supposedly couldn't be written using syntax-rules. Hah!
+
+(test (define-syntax set*!
+ (syntax-rules
+ ()
+ ((set*! (?var ?val) ...)
+ (set*!-help (?val ...) () (?var ?val) ...))))
+ (define-syntax set*!-help
+ (syntax-rules
+ ()
+ ((set*!-help () (?temp ...) (?var ?val) ...)
+ (let ((?temp ?val) ...)
+ (set! ?var ?temp) ...))
+ ((set*!-help (?var1 ?var2 ...) ?temps ?assignments ...)
+ (set*!-help (?var2 ...) (temp . ?temps) ?assignments ...))))
+ (let ((x 3)
+ (y 4)
+ (z 5))
+ (set*! (x (+ x y z))
+ (y (- x y z))
+ (z (* x y z)))
+ (list x y z))
+
+ '(12 -6 60))
+
+(test (let ((else #f))
+ (cond (#f 3)
+ (else 4)
+ (#t 5)))
+ 5)
+
+(test (define-syntax push
+ (syntax-rules ()
+ ((push item place)
+ (set! place (cons item place)))))
+ (let* ((cons (lambda (name)
+ (case name
+ ((phil) '("three-card monte"))
+ ((dick) '("secret plan to end the war"
+ "agnew"
+ "not a crook"))
+ ((jimmy) '("why not the best"))
+ ((ron) '("abolish the draft"
+ "balance the budget"))
+ (else '()))))
+ (scams (cons 'phil)))
+ (push (car (cons 'jimmy)) scams)
+ (push (cadr (cons 'ron)) scams)
+ scams)
+ '("balance the budget" "why not the best" "three-card monte"))
+
+(test (define-syntax replic
+ (syntax-rules ()
+ ((_ (?x ...) (?y ...))
+ (let ((?x (list ?y ...)) ...)
+ (list ?x ...)))))
+ (replic (x y z) (1 2))
+ '((1 2) (1 2) (1 2)))
+
+;; The behavior of this one is one is not specified by R5RS, below
+;; is what SCM does.
+;(test (define-syntax spread
+; (syntax-rules ()
+; ((_ ?x (?y ...))
+; '(((?x ?y) ...)))))
+; (spread x (1 2 3))
+; '(((x 1) (x 2) (x 3))))
+
+(cond
+ ((null? synerrs)
+ (newline)
+ (display "Passed all tests\n")
+ (display "Load \"syntest2\" to rewrite derived expressions and test\n"))
+ (else
+ (newline)
+ (display "FAILED, errors were:")
+ (newline)
+ (display "(got expected call)")
+ (newline)
+ (for-each (lambda (l) (write l) (newline)) synerrs)
+ (newline)))
+